ARCHIVED REPORTS UIC PERMIT APP - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

was kept frozen on dry ice during transport. The samples were analyzed by methods listed in Tzable 5.3. On May 16, a composite sample suite of water was collected from the three storage tanks. This was done to provide NCPA with a record of the chemistry of the water which was later injected. The sampling, preservation and analysis techniques were similar to those for the formation water samples. Analytical results for the formation water are listed in Thble 5.4, and the laboratory reports are included in Appendix B. As shown in the table, the total dissolved solids content of the Domengine water was determined to be 14,066 mg/l. The laboratory analytical reports in Appendix B list results for both the produced formation water and the composite injection water samples. Sample ID's for the formation water samples end in the number "1" and ID's for the injection water end in the letter "I". 6.0 CONFIRMATION OF SAND CONTROL PROBLEM Although there had been a problem with running sand during perforating, it appeared that the sand had stabilized during the last five hours of the cleanout and production operation. Therefore, on May 16 operations were begun to run a shut-in temperature log and perform an injection test, with no further attention to the sand problem. Logging tools were run in the hole, but they stopped on apparent sand fill at 4,108 ft (126 ft above the top perforation). Halliburton filled the hole with water and pressured up to 450 psig on the wellhead, and it was confirmed that the plug was solid and the well would not take water. The scheduled injection test was then postponed pending resolution of the sand control problem. Mesquite Group, Inc. -12