Laserfiche WebLink
a� MEMORANDUM . <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road Phone: (916) 361-5600 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 ATSS: 8-495-5600 <br /> TO: GARY REENTS FROM: TWILA LECLERC <br /> Senior Engineer Area Engineer <br /> DATE: 17 March 1989 SIGNATURE: <br /> .C��I�C'/ <br /> SUBJECT: Martinez Construction, Woodbridge <br /> I have reviewed the report, "Soil Gas Investigation, California Fuels <br /> Property, Woodbridge, CA, " dated February 1989, prepared by GHH <br /> Engineering, Inc. , and have the following comments: <br /> i <br /> 1. The proposed soil excavation is acceptable. <br /> 2. The proposal needs a soil-sampling rationalemorespecific than <br /> "random" soil samples to be taken during the excavation. <br /> 3. The data in Table 1 show that contamination levels increase with <br /> depth which is an indication that the ground water may be <br /> contaminated from past leakage. Accordingly, it will be <br /> necessary to install a 4-inch-diameter monitoring well in the <br /> center of the impacted area to -determine if the ground water, has <br /> been impacted. <br /> 4. Monitoring well screen should be installed'. at least 10 feet <br /> above and 20 feet below the water table. <br /> 5. Continuous coring should be utilized for logging the lithology <br /> during the well construction. <br /> - 6: -Appropriatescre n-and-fiite-r-pack-sizes`sizevji!ld—be--specif ed-arid -- <br /> used. <br /> 7. Well development must be performed to produv: a surging action. <br /> Simple bailing is not adequate. <br /> 8. If the well is developed ,appropriately, it r.s� not necessary to <br /> wait 24 hours before collecting ground water samples. <br /> 9. If the well recharges too slowly to effectively purge., it should <br /> be evacuated to dry and samples collected :a.T-r soon as there is <br /> adequate water. The proposed methodology in the workplan is not <br /> acceptable. <br />