Laserfiche WebLink
Page 1 of 3 <br /> Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> From: Tim Cuellar[tcuellar@advgeoenv.com] <br /> Sent: Friday,June 18,2010 4:19 PM <br /> To: Vicki McCartney [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: Lodi Airport <br /> Thanks Vicki, <br /> Sorry about the mis-communication. 1 will relay the information to Bob Kupka. Have a great weekend. <br /> - tim <br /> Timothy J. Cuellar <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental, Inc. <br /> Stockton • Santa Rosa • Monterey • Brea • Spokane • Reno <br /> 1-800-511-9300 <br /> tcuellar(a advyeoenv.com <br /> www.advgeoenv.com <br /> This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and <br /> privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this email/fax is <br /> prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient,please contact the sender by email/fax and destroy all <br /> paper and electronic copies of the original message. <br /> From: Vicki McCartney [EH] [mailto:vmccartney@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 4:07 PM <br /> To: tcuellar@advgeoenv.com <br /> Subject: RE: Lodi Airport <br /> Tim, <br /> When I spoke to you on 15 June 2010 about the Lodi Airport site, I believe you told me that the responsible party <br /> had not received any money from the Clean Up Fund (CUF)and did not expect to get any money since the <br /> papers that the responsible party has submitted to the CUF have been denied. I thought you had indicated that <br /> the responsible party is not expecting to get reimbursement from the CUF and wants to excavate the soil and pay <br /> out of his own pocket. <br /> If the responsible party expects to be reimbursed from the CUF, then he must follow the CUF's guidance and <br /> must submit a cost analysis to show that excavation is the most cost effective method to remediate the Lodi <br /> Airport site. <br /> Vicki McCartney, Senior REHS <br /> San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department <br /> 6/18/2010 <br />