My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VICTOR
>
1220
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009056
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2019 9:07:45 AM
Creation date
10/3/2019 8:43:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009056
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004059
FACILITY_NAME
LODI DOOR & METAL CO
STREET_NUMBER
1220
STREET_NAME
VICTOR
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LODI
Zip
95240
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1220 VICTOR RD
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 4 • • <br /> Concert #7 <br /> We still don' t have any values for the aquifer parameters in the shallow <br /> water bearing zone(s) , the zone which appear to have been impacted from <br /> past waste disposal practices. The values of transmissivity and the <br /> storage coefficient presented in the HAR were only estimates, based on <br /> lithology. These values need to be confirmed, before the HAR is <br /> complete. A pumping test, using one of the shallow wells may help <br /> define if wells MW-1 through MW-5 are screened in different zones. <br /> Also, more reliable data can be collected since drawdown measurements <br /> will be taken in observation wells in the same zone, and not just the <br /> pumped well . <br /> Answer #7 <br /> Section 25208.13. (f) . (3) of the California Toxic Pits Cleanup Act <br /> requires "an estimate of the transmissivity, permiability, and storage <br /> coefficient We have provided these estimates based upon <br /> observed lithology. Another pump test could provide the basis for <br /> refined estimates, but we do not propose another pump test because the <br /> tests are very expensive and the results would have very little value, <br /> especially in this situation where the source of contamination has been <br /> removed and the extent of contamination is very slight and does not <br /> appear to represent any threat to regional groundwater quality. I <br /> propose instead to complete the closure of the surface impoundment <br /> (after approval by the California DHS and RWQCB) and continue to monitor <br /> according to the June 13, 1990 monitoring order from the RWQCB. <br /> Concern #8 <br /> If another pumping test is performed, static water levels in all wells <br /> should be established the day before the test, to monitor any <br /> fluctuations in the water levels prior to pumping. Recovery data should <br /> be collected until the values don' t change significantly over a three <br /> hour period. All wells should be monitored at regular intervals. A <br /> step-drawdown test should be conducted before the test is run to <br /> establish an appropriate flow-rate. The flow-rate should be large <br /> enough to see significant drawdown in the other wells in the same zone. <br /> Answer #8 <br /> If another pumping test is performed, we will consult with you <br /> concerning the test parameters prior to conducting the test. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.