Laserfiche WebLink
07/19/96 PRI 10 41 FAX 583 3282 ULTRAKAR i + HORIZON SAC Q 004 <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD <br /> STAFF <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> FOR <br /> CLOSURE REQUEST'S <br /> The Central Valley Undergmund Tank Program (Program) is unplemented to <br /> achieve the goals of State P0hcies, regulations, and procedures adopted by the State <br /> Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Board's Basir% Plans To provide <br /> consistency in the Program, the Trf-Regtonal Board Staff Recommendations for <br /> PrChm:nary Investigation and Evaluation of Underground Tank Saes and its <br /> Appendix A, both based on concepts originally developed in 1981 by the Central <br /> Valley Regional Board staff, are revised periodically to accommodate statutory, <br /> regulation and policy changes. Appendix A prescribes minimum report contents <br /> which are to be submitted for review and approval. Appendix A streamlines the <br /> process for investigation and cleanup of sites to assure the discharger that the <br /> remediation system proposed is appropriate for the site subsurface conditions. <br /> Appendix B for site closure has been developed to complete the documentation <br /> --2j process. ZiLmpliance with Regional Board's Appendix B is necessary before a request <br /> for closure may be submitted The request must include signatures of registered <br /> individuals as required by the California Business and Professions Code. The <br /> purpose for a closure report is to provide a document upon which the regulator may <br /> make art objective decision regarding the requested closure. The closure report and <br /> the Board's sum=ary closure letter will remain on file in the Regional Board office <br /> for public review. <br /> Central Valley Regional Board staff recognize that total cleanup of a site, although <br /> generally possible, is not always feasible or warranted ("site" includes on- and/gr off- <br /> site problems resulting from the release of underground storage tank contents). <br /> Therefore, closure of a site may be unconditional if the site has been remediated <br /> successfully,or with conditions that "no further action is required at this time" when <br /> .ter total cleanup can not be achievedCRegardless of the action requested,a closure report <br /> is required for Regional Board review. The closure report is to document whether <br /> complete remediation of the site has been achieved, or that a "no further action" <br /> closure of a site is warranted and that some ,sod or ground water contanmutants will <br /> remain. <br /> +--� The report must discuss the site history, existing conditions, and rationale why the <br /> site may be closed with contamination renis rung. The rationale must include a <br /> finding aboututu a !MP- crs on water quality and health, The summa checklist is <br /> to be completed and submitted with the closure report by the Responsible PaRyUR or <br /> their designee. If it has been determixted that only soil has been impacted, evidence <br /> substantiating the condition must be submitted. <br /> V d wc2!. Wb LE LL 9sst-61-L <br />