My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0012498
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOURFIELD
>
3858
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1900092
>
SU0012498
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2020 12:25:26 PM
Creation date
11/6/2019 8:11:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0012498
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1900092
STREET_NUMBER
3858
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MOURFIELD
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206-
APN
17524027
ENTERED_DATE
8/14/2019 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
3858 S MOURFIELD AVE
RECEIVED_DATE
8/14/2019 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
FINDINGS FOR MINOR SUBDIVISION <br /> PA-1900092 <br /> COREY AND TRU LEEIWELTY ENGINEERING <br /> 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, any applicable Master Plan, Specific <br /> Plan, and Special Purpose Plan and any other applicable plan adopted by the County. <br /> • The proposed Minor Subdivision Map PA-1900092 is consistent with the General Plan, <br /> any applicable Specific Plan and Special Purpose Plan and any other applicable plan <br /> adopted by the County because the R/L land use designation permits the division <br /> proposed. Further, no specific plans are involved. <br /> 2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and <br /> any applicable Specific Plan or Special Purpose Plan. <br /> • The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General <br /> Plan and any applicable Specific Plan or Special Purpose Plan because the design and <br /> improvements meet the minimum standards contained in the General Plan as reflected <br /> in the Tentative Map. <br /> 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. <br /> • The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed because all <br /> development requirements contained in the Development Title and all minimum County <br /> standards are met. <br /> 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. <br /> • The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development because the <br /> number of parcels proposed is consistent with the General Plan density. <br /> 5. Neither the design of the subdivision nor any proposed improvements are likely to cause <br /> substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their <br /> habitat. <br /> • The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause <br /> substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidable injure fish or wildlife <br /> or their habitat because the Initial Study prepared for this project does not list any rare, <br /> endangered, or threatened species or habitat located on or near the site. <br /> 6. The design of the subdivision or type of improvement is not likely to cause significant public health <br /> problems. <br /> • The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious <br /> public health problems because any conditions attached to the approval will address <br /> any potential public health problems. <br /> 7. The design of the subdivision or the types of improvements will not conflict with easements <br /> acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed <br /> subdivision. <br /> • The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with <br /> easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property <br /> within the proposed subdivision because if it is found that alternate easements, for <br /> access or for use, are necessary, that these will be substantially equivalent to ones <br /> PA-1900092 (MS) Findings 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.