Laserfiche WebLink
`• - Martin <br /> Thorpe <br /> . � 16 October 1987 <br /> 1 WEISS ASS OCL4TES. <br /> was detected at S. s <br /> Ppb in MW-I. fSoluble lead con ray of ns ranged <br /> below -detection 'xn -2._ -= -. -_ - - <br /> to 3 ppb_yin MW-1. One <br /> ppb�Iead was detected in MW3 . - <br /> - <br /> G4/FID analysis of the development water composite sample collected by WA <br /> was below the detection limits of I ppm for TFHC. and <br /> _ `.0 ppm fox- B „ <br /> 5 <br /> on these resu3sed <br /> tsFran- .Forka.;_of . the. . LDE'W.-authorized.: $athe <br /> � .. ..�. _ <br /> I <br /> deve_loprnent water to theground surface: - <br /> LI <br /> Prior to the 8 September saillpling, B&C discharged the drummed. : WA <br />� .. <br /> development water. They then directed their sampling purge water to the <br /> ` emptied ' drums. At the conclusion of their sampling, Lthey collected samples <br /> from the ,drums which were composited at B&C- and analyzed by EPA Method 602 for , <br /> x <br /> BTX <br /> CC/PID analysis of the B&C purge water indicated 1,203 ppb benzene, L50. <br /> Ppb ethylbenzene, -.160 ppb toluene and 1.60or total xylene isomers This .water <br /> will be disiosed of. appropriat:ely. <br /> Analytic results for water samples are presented in Table 2 and copies of <br /> laboratory report forms are included in -Attachment: B. <br /> GROUND WATER GRADIENT <br /> Top-of-casing (TOC) elevations were surveyed on. 1.1 August 1987. The <br /> datum elevatiois :for, the survey . was USGS benchmark -#191, located at the <br /> southeast .corner. of the intersection of Lodi Avenue and Stockton ".Street =-TOC- <br /> elevations and water level data,are presented in Table. 3-. <br /> Two Grater table elevation maps were prepared for' this investigation. <br /> Figure 3 shows water level data collected on 25 Au ust a I' <br /> g and Figure 4 shows data. <br /> collected on 11 September -1987. Both figures indicate a'' north to <br /> northeastward ground water -flow, although Figure 3. indic4tzs a more pronounced <br /> eastward component. The gradients shown in Figures 3 and 4 are opposite to <br /> the southwestward direction of groundwater flow suggested by local topography <br /> and the regional hydraulic gradient. <br />