Laserfiche WebLink
%0001 SM001 <br /> TABLE 1 - CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DATA <br /> FOR NO FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND TANK SITES <br /> Site Dame and Location: Arts &Artists, 204 E. Lodi Ave., Lodi, San Joaquin County <br /> 1.Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic, agriculture, industry and Muni. wells 350 ft E., 1,500 ft W.,2,000 ft N., <br /> other uses within 2000 feet of the site; 3,500 ft S.(operating),remaining off-line or <br /> abandoned.pumping rates depth unknown <br /> 2. Site malts. to scale. of area impacted showing locations of former and existing tank sy —s. 1550 gallon tank removed <br /> excavation g9ntours and sample locations, boring and moni Q na well elevation contours. 12186 <br /> gMakatj and nead2v sUjfAre waters. buffifingand subsurface utilities; <br /> -1 3. Figures depicting lithology(cross section), treatment system diagrams; cross-sections and well logs <br /> 0 4. Stockpiled soil remaining on-site or off-site disposal(quantity); Stockpiled soli was spread on-site and used for <br /> gardening prior to final sampling and analysis <br /> 0 5. Monitoring wells remaining on-site, fate; 8 <br /> Y❑ 6. Tabulated results of all groundwater elevations and depths to water, 49.28 to 61.45 ft bgs <br /> El7.Tabulated results of all sampling and analyses: <br /> FYIDetection limits for confirmation sampling <br /> HLead analyses <br /> El8. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in soil Soil contamination extended approximately <br /> and groundwater, and both on-site and off-site: 65 ft diameter and 50 ft bgs. 2 slugs of <br /> Y Lateral and Y Vertical extent of soil contamination impacted soil remain approximately 40 ft <br /> diameter to 55 ft bgs. <br /> N Lateral and N Vertical extent of groundwater contamination <br /> Y7 9.Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface 25-35 ft SVE Remediation well 50 ft bgs <br /> remediation system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and <br /> groundwater remediation system; <br /> 0 10.Reports/information Yl Unauthorized Release Form 8/2/89 SMRs(Dates) 7/87 to 10/97 <br /> M Welland boring logs YI PAR 1/94E FRP 0 Other(report name) Closure RPT <br /> N 11.Best Available Technology(BAT) used or an explanation fornot using BAT, SVEIIAS,tank removed,and contaminated <br /> soil excavated. <br /> Q12.Reasons why background wads unattainable using BAT,• Actual concentration and amount of gw contamination <br /> unknown <br /> 3 13.Mass balance calculation of substance treated versus that remaining, Mass balance for soil only. Amount in gw not <br /> determined. <br /> 0 14.Assumptions, parameters, calculations and model used in tisk Possiple based on incomplete data due to the extent of <br /> assessments, and fate and transport modeling; gw contamination not being defined. <br /> 15.Rationale why conditions remaining at site will not adversely The plume of contamination was never defined vertically <br /> impact water quality, health, or other beneficial uses;and or laterally, because the influence of nearby pumping <br /> municipal wells was not considered. <br /> 0 16.WET or TCLP results <br /> By.' Comments: The vertical extent of the remaining contamination needs to be verified and purged <br /> water needs to be analyzed for petroleum contaminants and properly disposed <br />