Laserfiche WebLink
' 6.2.2 In-situ Treatment Alternatives <br /> Two methods of in-situ remediation are discussed in this section. Groundwater <br /> bioremediation could accompany bioremediation of the vadose zone. Alternatively, air <br /> sparging could be performed in conjunction with vapor extraction from the vadose zone. <br />' 6.2.2.1 Bioremediation <br /> 6.2.2.1.1 Principles <br /> In-situ bioremediation of the saturated zone involves many of the same principles and soil <br />' requirements as in-situ bioremediation of the vadose zone. Bacterial growth and migration <br /> may be somewhat more rapid in the saturated zone, due to increased mobility in saturated <br /> pore space. To increase subsurface air flow and enhance bacterial growth, a soil blower is <br />' commonly manifolded to the inoculation wells. Although blowers can lead to soil <br /> dehydration in the vadose zone, this is less likely in the saturated zone. However, regulatory <br />' agencies have been reticent to permit groundwater treatment by in-situ bioremediation, <br /> partly because of concerns over the introduction of bacteria and chemicals into groundwater. <br /> These concerns may force submittal of Waste Discharge Permits, which require additional <br />' time and expense. <br /> 6.2.2.1.2 Inoculation Wells <br /> In-situ bioremediation of groundwater at this site can be accomplished by injecting the <br /> bacteria into monitoring wells MW-1, MW-3, MW-4, and MW-5, as well as vadose-zone well <br /> ' RW-1. These wells are all located within the plume of contaminated groundwater, and wells <br /> MW-4 and MW-5 are screened at least 10 feet into the saturated zone. Although MW-3 is <br /> not screened within the saturated zone, the lower portion of this well is within the capillary <br /> ' fringe, allowing bacteria to reach groundwater. Slug tests on MW-4 and MW-6 indicated that <br /> aquifer permeability is moderate; depending on bacterial migration rates, each well could <br /> have a radius of influence of 15 feet within 3 months if inoculated with 100 gallons of <br /> ' medium. Additional inoculation wells, or reinoculation events, could be added to speed <br /> remediation if periodic monitoring indicates that the process is proceeding slowly. <br /> ' 6.2.2.1.3 Monitoring Activities <br /> The methods of monitoring in-situ bioremediation of groundwater are the same as those for <br /> ' remediation of soil, except that groundwater analyses include bacterial populations and <br /> dissolved oxygen. Monitoring is also more frequent; groundwater depth measurements and <br /> samples should be collected monthly for the first six months to ensure that injection of <br /> ' bacteria or distilled water has not altered groundwater flow or. caused spread of the <br /> contaminant plume. <br /> 1 <br /> Clog I Aud«Se rvkc Inc. �� <br /> ARI PARn-29-Wa.47 <br />