Laserfiche WebLink
water aquifer, it is possible that any remaining surface contaminants may be transported <br /> to the first saturated zone of the aquifer. <br /> First ground water is predicted at 83 to 93 feet below ground surface for this Site; <br /> consequently, significant nitrate reduction would be anticipated as the septic effluent <br /> percolates downward. In addition, clay soils, like those found on the Site, are known to <br /> restrict downward movement of water, and may provide nitrogen reduction through <br /> adhesion to the soil particles. <br /> Sources of Nitrate <br /> Dairies, orchards that require fertilization in sandy soils, and septic systems have been <br /> found to be the most significant sources of nitrate in ground water. <br /> Percolating Recharge Waters <br /> One of the most determinant factors in the Hantzsche and Finnemore equation is the <br /> rate of recharge from percolating waters, which mix with the downward-percolating <br /> effluent generated by on-site septic systems. In the original Hantzsche and Finnemore <br /> paper, only "average recharge rate of rainfall" was considered. For the Chico area, <br /> Hantzsche and Finnemore present an average rainfall of 22.5 inches per year and an <br /> estimated recharge of 16.8 inches per year. <br /> Based on San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department policy (personal <br /> communication, March 18, 2019), the recharge input for the Hantzsche and Finnemore <br /> equation should be derived from average monthly precipitation of rainfall and <br /> evapotranspiration rates for the area; the data should be obtained from the California <br /> Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS). Recharge is calculated by first <br /> determining whether the average monthly precipitation exceeds average monthly <br /> potential evapotranspiration. If so, then the difference is the percolating recharge water <br /> into the aquifer. Runoff and stream infiltration drainage are not factored into the <br /> calculation. This approach likely under-estimates recharge to the aquifer and, <br /> consequently, over-estimates nitrate loading. <br /> For the project Site, the local precipitation and evapotranspiration rates are presented in <br /> Plate 15. The closest CIMIS station to the Site is Staten Island (station 242). Data for <br /> the Staten Island station were available for the past three years; based on the <br /> calculation shown, the estimated rate of recharge from percolating waters for the Staten <br /> Island station is determined to be 12.60 inches (Plate 15). A statistical error of 49 <br /> percent is associated with this value. <br /> The nitrate concentration of the recharge waters was estimated to be 1 mg/L-N <br /> (Hantzsche and Finnemore). <br /> LOGE 1920 Page 9 <br />