My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SACRAMENTO
>
712
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0528086
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2019 1:44:20 PM
Creation date
11/12/2019 1:25:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0528086
PE
2959
FACILITY_ID
FA0019017
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER LODI MGP
STREET_NUMBER
712
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
SACRAMENTO
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04532006
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
712 S SACRAMENTO ST
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t Stantec Consulting Corporation <br /> 57 Lafayette Circle 2nd Floor <br /> Lafayette CA 64549 <br /> Tel:(925)299-9300 <br /> Fax:(925)299-9302 <br /> Stantec <br /> April 28, 2009 <br /> Project: 185701168. 200.0006 <br /> Robert Aragon <br /> Department of Toxic Substances Control <br /> 700 Heinz Avenue <br /> Berkeley, California 94710 <br /> Dear Mr. Aragon: <br /> Re: Response to DTSC Comments -Well Abandonment Work Plan <br /> Pacific Gas and Electric, Former Lodi Manufactured Gas Plant, Lodi, California <br /> On behalf of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E), Stantec Consulting Corporation (Stantec) is <br /> submitting this letter as a response to Jim Rohrer's March 23, 2009 letter reviewing the February 4, 2009 <br /> Well Abandonment Work Plan for the Former Lodi Manufactured Gas Plant located at 712 South Sacramento <br /> Street in Lodi, California (Site, Figure 1). <br /> PG&E is conducting an investigation at the site under Hazardous Substances Site Cleanup Agreement No. <br /> HSA-VCA 06/07 182 of the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)Voluntary Cleanup <br /> Program. This response letter presents the DTSC comments and recommendations followed by PG&E's <br /> response in italics. <br /> MARCH 23, 2009 COMMENTS—Jim Rohrer <br /> SPECIFIC COMMENTS <br /> 1) Groundwater in the two former wells to be abandoned may be contaminated. It is also possible that if <br /> these wells are sufficiently deep that they acted as conduits for contamination to impact deeper groundwater <br /> zones. <br /> Recommendation: If groundwater is encountered in either of the two former water wells to be abandoned <br /> during the rotary drilling work, then collect groundwater sample(s)from the wells prior to abandoning the <br /> wells. If the wells are significantly deeper than first encountered groundwater, then consideration should be <br /> given to collecting groundwater samples from deeper depths. Packers could be utilized to help isolate deeper <br /> sampling depths during low-flow purging. <br /> Response: <br /> A water rotary rig is proposed for the cleaning out of the well casing so the presence of groundwater will not <br /> be easily ascertained during drilling operations. Based on the driller's experience with older wells, the option <br /> of using an air rotary rig in place of the water rotary rig it is not recommended. It is the driller's experience <br /> with abandoning older steel casing wells that the air rotary rig may put excessive pressure on the casing and <br /> it could blow out(destroy, break) the casing. <br /> PG&E conducted soil and groundwater sampling at the site in October 2008. The locations of the sample <br /> locations are shown on Figure 2. Depth to water encountered in the borings was greater than 60 feet(61 feet <br /> in GW-1 and 64 feet in GW-2), and groundwater analytical results showed minimal MGP impacts <br /> (groundwater analytical results are posted on Figure 2). This groundwater elevation data is consistent with <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.