Laserfiche WebLink
RISK ASSESSMENT <br /> Site <br /> The greatest risk ass�)ciated with the site, with the entire project, is <br /> d threat to groundwater if a remediation project is not <br /> the continue <br /> initiated. threarbon vapors were detected to a depth of 34 feet below <br /> grade at temporary vapor probes installed for the remedial investigation, <br /> At th of <br /> the time of the oin5 stfeetiobelowougdwater rade. waAlthoughedaatgroandwater <br /> approximately og to be initiated, and even if the groundwater at <br /> remediation program is <br /> the site is fully remediated, hydrocarbons that remain in the soil may <br /> migrate down to groundwater level with the passage of <br /> osoiltime, <br /> during <br /> i � groundwater may come in contact with hydrocarbon-imp' <br /> periods of higher water table level, i .e., during the winter months of e <br /> normal rainfall year. ti�eSQf�re, The currenminate <br /> tis portant to drought status�provides tan <br /> hydrocarbon source <br /> excellent opportunity to achieve remediation with minimal threat to the <br /> groundwater. <br /> In-Situ Vapor Extraction Soil Remediation System <br /> The greatest risks associated with ehui mentdiduroingemeatinasystemtunderground <br /> risks associated with use of heavy q p <br /> installation procedures. However, since the project site is a vacant <br /> lot, public contact with the site should be minimal. Additional <br /> perceived risks associated with this technology are emissions of air <br /> pollutants and noise. Since the air emission levels will be regulated by <br /> e levels emitted will not be a threat to public <br /> county agencies, thes <br /> health. There will be noiseno cgenerated duringlled ssystemiloperation provean <br /> technology. Should the 9 <br /> annoyance, the system equipment or equipment layout can be modified. The <br /> There are nooject otherdlrmitationsation using <br /> ssociatedextr withcusenofsth6to <br /> is technology12 .There ar <br /> Soil Excavation and Disposal <br /> This remediation alternative has the greatest risks associated with it. <br /> There are major hazards to the public and field technicians associated <br /> with excavation of large quantities of soil: use of heavyequipment, <br /> danger of the sidewalls of the excavation pit collapsing, <br /> large quantities of soil, and the open pit resulting from the excavation. <br /> - Although public contact with the project site will be minimal and chain <br /> cavated area, <br /> the danger remains until the <br /> link fencing will secure the ex <br /> prcject is completed, ardsthe <br /> associatedd with ithisbackfilled <br /> alternativecoilnclude: <br /> The environmental haze <br /> _ uncontrolled vapor releases from the exposed soil to the environmen am <br /> the possibility that not all of the hydrocarbon impacted soil is removed. <br /> - 9 - <br /> A; <br />