Laserfiche WebLink
CENTRAL VALLEY WATER BOP RESPONSE{SWRCB/OCC File A-1846; �_ <br /> PETITIONS FOR REVIEW OF WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS <br /> ORDER NO. R5-2007-0036 (NPDES NO. CA0079154)AND <br /> TIME SCHEDULE ORDER NO. R5-2007-0037 <br /> CITY OF TRACY, WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT <br /> concentration. A maximum daily effluent limit of 300 Ng/L for total recoverable metal iron <br /> was included in the Tracy Permit, because the Basin Plan site-specific objective is <br /> expressed as a maximum concentration. It is impracticable to convert the site-specific <br /> numeric maximum concentration objective to weekly average and monthly average effluent <br /> limits, because there are no guidelines for converting the objective. <br /> pH. The Basin Plan includes numeric water quality,objectives that the pH "...not be <br /> depressed below 6.5 nor raised above 8.5. Changes in normal ambient pH levels shall not <br /> exceed 0.5 in fresh waters with designated COLD or WARM beneficial uses." (Basin Plan <br /> pg. III-6.0) The receiving water is designated as having both COLD and WARM beneficial <br /> uses. Effluent limitations for pH were included in the Tracy Permit based on the Basin Plan <br /> water quality objective for pH. The Tracy Permit includes instantaneous maximum and <br /> minimum pH effluent limitations of 8.5 and 6.5, respectively, which are applied to ensure <br /> compliance with the Basin Plan objective. It is impracticable to convert the instantaneous <br /> numeric objectives to average weekly and average monthly effluent limits because there <br /> are no guidelines for converting the objectives. <br /> Turbidity and Total Coliform. Title 22 requires that the effluent total coliform levels not <br /> exceed 2.2 MPN/100 ml as a 7-day median. The Tracy Permit includes this requirement <br /> as an effluent limitation based on Department of Public Health recommendations, as <br /> discussed under "BODS and TSS," above. Therefore, we believe it is appropriate and <br /> necessary to set effluent limitations for total coliform and that the Central Valley Water <br /> Board acted properly to set the total coliform effluent limitations to ensure compliance with <br /> Title 22 reclamation recommendations to protect public health. In addition to coliform <br /> testing, turbidity is another indicator of the effectiveness of the treatment process and <br /> turbidity monitoring can assure compliance with the required level of treatment. The <br /> Central Valley Water Board has typically used turbidity to measure or demonstrate the <br /> proper operation of the filtration treatment component. Historically these measurements <br /> were set as effluent limits and were reported as such; however, the effluent limitations <br /> were not intended to regulate turbidity in the receiving water. The Central Valley Water <br /> Board acted to correct the placement of turbidity controls in recent permits by removing the <br /> turbidity effluent limitations and establishing operational provisions that set numeric <br /> turbidity measures for the filtration system. This will ensure the treatment system is <br /> functioning properly and is producing a pathogen free effluent. Therefore, we believe the <br /> turbidity limitation should be an operational parameter to determine proper system function <br /> and not a water quality-based effluent limitation, as required in the Tracy Permit. Central <br /> Valley Water Board staff recommends that the Tracy Permit be remanded to reconsider <br /> the water quality-based effluent limitations for turbidity. <br />