My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_CASE 2
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HOLLY
>
3900
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505422
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_CASE 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2019 1:40:39 PM
Creation date
11/15/2019 1:28:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
CASE 2
RECORD_ID
PR0505422
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0006902
FACILITY_NAME
TRACY WASTEWATER TX PLNT
STREET_NUMBER
3900
STREET_NAME
HOLLY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3900 HOLLY DR
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
374
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REGIONAL WATER BOARD RESPONSE (SWRCB/OCC File A-1846(a) and A-1846(b)) _16- <br /> PETITIONS FOR REVIEW OF V E DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS <br /> ORDER NO. R5-2007-0036 (NPDCO NO. CA0079154) AND <br /> TIME SCHEDULE ORDER NO. R5-2007-0037 <br /> CITY OF TRACY, WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT <br /> CSPA — CONTENTION G: Temperature limitations violate the Basin Plan, Thermal Plan <br /> and federal regulations. Unless the Order is allowing a mixing zone, compliance with the <br /> effluent limitation would cause immediate violation of the Receiving Water Limitations. The <br /> receiving water limitations are apparently based on Basin Plan water quality objectives, <br /> whereas the Effluent Limitation appears-to_hatye no technical or legal explanation. <br /> CSPA contends that the temperature limitations violate the Basin Plan, Thermal Plan and <br /> federal regulations. Regional Water Board staff disagree with this contention. The <br /> temperature effluent limitations and receiving water limitations in Order R5-2007-0036 are <br /> applied based on the Thermal Plan's water quality objectives for temperature. <br /> The State Water Board adopted a Water Quality Control Plan for Control of Temperature in <br /> the Coastal and Interstate Waters and Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California (Thermal <br /> Plan) on 18 May 1972, and amended this plan on 18 September 1975. This plan contains <br /> temperature objectives for inland surface waters. The Thermal Plan is applicable to the <br /> discharge. For purposes of the Thermal Plan, the Discharger is considered to be an Existing <br /> Discharger of Elevated Temperature Waste. The Thermal Plan in section 5.A. requires the <br /> following: <br /> "5. Estuaries <br /> A. Existing discharges <br /> (1) Elevated temperature waste discharges shall comply with the following: <br /> a. The maximum temperature shall not exceed the natural receiving water <br /> temperature by more than 20°F. <br /> b. Elevated temperature waste discharges either individually or combined with <br /> other discharges shall not create a zone, defined by water temperatures of <br /> more than 1 OF above natural receiving water temperature, which exceeds <br /> 25 percent of the cross-sectional area of a main river channel at any point. <br /> c. No discharge shall cause a surface water temperature rise greater than 4°F <br /> above the natural temperature of the receiving waters at any time or place. <br /> d. Additional limitations shall be imposed when necessary to assure protection <br /> of beneficial uses. <br /> (2) Thermal waste discharges shall comply with the provisions of 5A (1) above <br /> and, in addition, the maximum temperature of thermal waste discharges shall <br /> not exceed 86°F." <br /> The Order includes effluent limitations in accordance with 5.A.(1)a of the Thermal Plan and <br /> receiving water limits in accordance with 5.A.(1)b and 5.A.(1)c. The Discharger currently <br /> complies with the Thermal Plan requirements at the existing flow rate of 9 mgd. However, <br /> modeling by the Discharger indicates that the 1°F limitation of Objective 5.A.(1)b of the <br /> Thermal Plan may be exceeded 3 months of the year at the expanded discharge flow rate of <br /> 16 mgd. As described in the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the expansion of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.