Laserfiche WebLink
LIVE OAK GEO ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. <br /> 407 W. Oak St., Lodi, CA 95240 :• (209)369-0375 :- logelodi.com <br /> May 6, 2019 <br /> Project Number: 1848 <br /> Jeffrey Wong, REHS <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> 1868 E. Hazelton Ave. <br /> Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> Regarding: Addendum to Soil Suitability/Nitrate Loading Study <br /> Ford Construction Facility <br /> 12505 E. Brandt Rd., Lockeford, CA <br /> Original report dated January 23, 2019 <br /> Mr. Wong: <br /> At your request, we have prepared this addendum to the above Nitrate Loading Study. You <br /> indicated that the nitrate loading calculation for the Site should be re-evaluated to include a <br /> recharge value derived from precipitation and evapotranspiration data from the California <br /> Irrigation Management Information System for the past five years. Additionally, you requested <br /> that we consider only the employees that are part of the current Site Approval application. <br /> Recharge Calculation <br /> As in the previous report prepared by our office, the method utilized for the nitrate loading <br /> analysis is based on a mass balance formula discussed in a published paper by Hantzsche and <br /> Finnemore (1992). The Hantzsche and Finnemore equation is a conservative approximation of <br /> ground-water nitrate-nitrogen concentration resulting from the combined effect of on-site <br /> sewage disposal systems and percolating recharge waters. <br /> For this addendum, the recharge input for the Hantzsche and Finnemore equation is derived <br /> from average monthly precipitation of rainfall and evapotranspiration rates for the area. The <br /> calculation first determines whether the average monthly precipitation exceeds average monthly <br /> potential evapotranspiration. If so, then the difference is the percolating recharge water into the <br /> aquifer. Runoff and stream infiltration drainage are not factored into the calculation. This <br /> approach likely under-estimates recharge to the aquifer and, consequently, over-estimates <br /> nitrate loading. <br /> For the project Site, the local percolation and evapotranspiration rates are presented in Plates 1 <br /> and 2. The Site is located between the CIMIS Stations at Holt (station 248) and Staten Island <br /> (station 242); taking both stations into account will yield a value more representative of the Site <br /> area. During the past five-year period, data from the Holt station were only available for 2017 <br /> and 2018; based on the calculation shown, the estimated rate of recharge from percolating <br /> waters for the Holt station is determined to be 3.72 inches (Plate 1). A statistical error of 25 <br /> percent is associated with this value. Data for the Staten Island station were available for the <br /> past three years; based on the calculation shown, the estimated rate of recharge from <br /> percolating waters for the Staten Island station is determined to be 12.60 inches (Plate 2). A <br /> Environmental Engineering Geology Geophysics <br />