Laserfiche WebLink
C A M B R I A Ms.Lori Duncan <br /> November 18,2005 <br /> investigation in our January 6, 2003 Site Investigation and Third Quarter 2003 Groundwater <br /> Monitoring Report. <br /> 2003 Site Conceptual Model (SCM): Cambria submitted a Site Conceptual Model/Site <br /> Investigation Work Plan on October 3, 2003. In the SCM, Cambria recommended installing a <br /> well downgradient of the USTs, installing a deep groundwater monitoring well, and performing <br /> dual-phase extraction(DPE) and SVE in the former UST complex. <br /> 2004 Well Installation: During February 2004, Cambria installed one shallow off-site well <br /> (MW-12) in the parking lot east of the site and one deep on-site well (MW-13). No TPHg, <br /> © BTEX, or fuel oxygenates were detected in well borings MW-12 and MW-13. Soil results from <br /> MW-12 indicate that subsurface soil across Pacific Avenue east of the existing UST complex is <br /> not impacted by gasoline constituents. Cambria's April 9, 2004 Site Investigation and First <br /> Quarter 2004 Groundwater Monitoring Report details this investigation. <br /> 2004 Interim DPE: During a 5-day period in June 2004, Cambria performed DPE using well <br /> VEW-2 and SVE using well VEW-1. Cambria estimates that approximately 200 pounds of <br /> vapor-phase TPHg and 2.31 pounds of vapor-phase benzene were removed from wells VEW-1 <br /> and VEW-2 during the course of this interim remediation. In addition, 3,486 gallons of <br /> groundwater were extracted from VEW-2, removing approximately 3.49 pounds of liquid-phase <br /> TPHg and 0.12 pounds of liquid-phase benzene from the subsurface. Cambria's February 9,2005 <br /> Interim Remediation Report further describes these activities. <br /> 2005 Corrective Action Plan (CAP): Cambria submitted a Corrective Action Plan and Risk- <br /> Based Corrective Action Analysis on September 9, 200. The CAP recommended DPE as the <br /> preferred remedial technology based on feasibility and cost-effectiveness and proposed <br /> groundwater and soil cleanup goals. In the September 15, 2005 letter approving the CAP, <br /> SCJEHD did not approve the proposed groundwater and soil cleanup goals. Instead, SJCEHD <br /> requested that Shell use maximum contaminant levels or water quality objectives in the Regional <br /> Water Quality Control Board basin plan as cleanup goals. <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Program: There are currently six on-site groundwater monitoring <br /> wells (MW-1 through MW-4, MW-13 and VEW-2), one on-site SVE well (VEW-1), and eight <br /> off-site groundwater monitoring wells (MW-5 through MW-12). VEW-2 was originally installed <br /> as an SVE well, and well MW-13 is screened deeper than the other wells. Wells MW-1 through <br /> MW-8, MW-12, MW-13, and VEW-2 are sampled quarterly, well MW-9 is sampled semi- <br /> annually during the first and third quarters, and wells MW-10 and MW-11 are sampled annually <br /> during the third quarter. Well VEW-1 is dry. <br /> During the third quarter 2005 sampling event,TPHg was detected in wells MW-3, MW-4,MW-6 <br /> through MW-11, and VEW-2 at concentrations ranging from 110 to 84,000 ppb. The laboratory <br /> noted that the TPHg reported for wells MW-10 and MW-11 reflects individual or discrete <br /> 4 <br />