Laserfiche WebLink
9 December 1991 <br /> (GeoAudit CV 4ZF5-1.26) <br /> Page 2 of. 7 <br /> DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER <br /> According to the Fall, 1990, "Map of Depth to Groundwater", <br /> preparr:d by San Joaquin County's Department of Public Works, Flood <br /> Control Section, groundwater underlies the site at a depth of 30--35 <br /> ft (approximately 20--25 ft below sea level) . Drilling at the 1320 <br /> W. Weber site, however, reveals that first groundwater is <br /> considerably shallower than this. According to the Fhase 11 report <br /> of WFF Environmental, wells dr 'led in 1989 and 1991 at that site <br /> reportedly encountered first groundwater in "Sand 1" at depths of <br /> between 13 and 19 ft. below grade. After well completion, <br /> groundwater subsequently rose a few feet above the base of "Clay A" <br /> and stabilized at 10-12 ft below grade, suggesting that "Sand A" is <br /> a semi.-confined aquifer and that slightly artesian conditions <br /> exist. <br /> Second groundwater stabilized in "Sand 2" approximately 3 ft below <br /> the piezometric surface of first groundwater in "Sand 1" in March, <br /> 1990. This indicates that "Sand 2" is a confined aquifer and that <br /> "Clay B" hydraulically separates "Sand 1" and "Sand 211. <br /> GROUNDWATER GRADIENT <br /> The site is located on the western edge of a moderately large <br /> groundwater depression that occupies the east-central portion of <br /> San Joaquin County. According to the SJCDPW, this depression has <br /> enlarged and deepened in the late 1980's and early 1990's, and the <br /> present maximum depth to groundwater in the depression is in excess <br /> of -70 ft below sea level. The depression is probably due to <br /> withdrawal in excess of inflow from the groundwater recharge area <br /> in the Sierra Nevada foothills to the east. Hence, regional <br /> groundwater flow is toward the center of this depression. Local <br /> flow in the vicinity of the site should therefore be in a generally <br /> eastward direction. However, the local gradient may be somewhat <br /> altered by the Stockton deep-water ship channel, which is located <br /> approximately 200 ft north of the site. The'water surface in the <br /> channel is approximately at sea level, roughly 10 ft above the <br /> depth of groundwater in the two on-site monitoring wells. <br /> Theoretically, the local flow could therefore be somewhat more to <br /> the south, out of the channel. This is apparently the case, because <br /> the groundwater gradient map prepared by WHF Environmental for 1320 <br /> W. Weber indicates a southeast gradient of approximately 0.45 ft <br /> per 100 ft. <br /> PREVIOUS SITE INVEITIGATIONS <br /> Thetwo underground tanks were removed by Jim Thorpe-OiT Co in <br /> a April, 1991. Neither tank was in use at that time, and neither will <br /> .be-replaced. <br /> if <br />