Laserfiche WebLink
PUBLt HEALTH Rlt�ICES <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY � :a <br /> JOGI KHANNA M.D..MT H. <br /> Health Officer <br /> P.O.B=2009•(1601 East Haekon Avg) •Stockton,CA f x-nia 95201 <br /> �L r jf byes <br /> (209)468-3400 <br /> RIC NOTIM <br /> DIRECTOR OF SWARDNMENTAL SSRVIC>l+S ` (03 <br /> Fly <br /> CAMO.0 S DEVELOF'bl'Wr CORP <br /> 2 10 <br /> 201 MISSION ST1i88T 30TH FUM UEC fl <br /> SAN MMaSCo CA 94105 <br /> RE: Farmers Peed SrM CODE: 1284 <br /> AM#145.190.16 <br /> 1515 Wert Wetter Ave,former tank#1 <br /> 1325 War Weber Ave,farmer rant#2 <br /> 1541 Weal Weber Ave,former tank#3 <br /> Stodm n,CA 95203 <br /> San Joaquin County,Public Health Services,Eavi=me=d Mdth Division (PHSIERD),has reviewed the <br /> 'bird Quarter Gmodwatw Monitoring Rgmt dated October 9, 1991 and the Interim Preliminary <br /> Assessment Export dated October 1991, both prepared by MU&West PHSM-0 comment follow. <br /> Third Quarter IM-0vowWwater MgWodFA SO= <br /> 1. PFWDM was not notified of the September 9, 1991 sampling event. Please be iafoimed <br /> that PHSAM faspections of sampling events are an important aspect of local regulatory, <br /> oversight. Prior to any future:sampling evanti please contact Mary Mesys at the number <br /> below,48 hours in advance. <br /> 2. Monitoring well purge records were not included. These records are important to verify, <br /> that groundwater cotes have stabilized printer to sampling. This information is <br /> nferenced in the b Appenft A. A cW is enclosed for your <br /> information. Please include monitoring well purge data in all kture quarterly reports. <br /> 3. Tidal influence was suggated to be the cause of shift from ,* southwest gradient to a <br /> southeast gratmdw"w gradient: Please include in quarterly reports a copy of the tide table <br /> I the date of sampft It may be necessary to do more frequent monitoring of <br /> groundwater depth in order to clarify the cause of fiuxations. It also may be necessary te <br /> have the monitoring wells pmlessionaUy surveyed to more accurately determine <br /> groundwater devotions. <br /> 4. Organic lead analysis does not difil rentlate between soluble and insoluble lead. <br /> Unfortmatdy, total lead c" -=trations of MW2 or MM soil boring samples were not <br /> analyzed. It will be necessary,to do additional investigation in order to determine the levels <br /> of lead that have a potential impact or that have ii W.,.d groundwater, The November,16, <br /> 1988 analysis of liquid from the 1515 West Weber tank pit Meated 2.6 ppm lead. <br /> A GivleMm dSn3 joquin Gixmty Heald Cazr See+dcYs �� <br />