Laserfiche WebLink
Potential) Less Than Less Than Analyzed <br /> Potentially Significant with <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No In The <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Prior EIR <br /> VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. <br /> Would the project: <br /> a)Generate greenhouse gas emissions,either directly or <br /> indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the ❑ a <br /> environment? <br /> b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation <br /> adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of ❑ ❑ <br /> greenhouse gases? <br /> Impact Discussion: <br /> a-b) The project is a General Plan Map Amendment and Zone Reclassification. Emissions of GHGs contributing to global <br /> climate change are attributable in large part to human activities associated with the industrial/manufacturing, utility, <br /> transportation, residential, and agricultural sectors.Therefore, the cumulative global emissions of GHGs contributing to <br /> global climate change can be attributed to every nation, region, and city, and virtually every individual on earth. An <br /> individual project's GHG emissions are at a micro-scale level relative to global emissions and effects to global climate <br /> change; however, an individual project could result in a cumulatively considerable incremental contribution to a <br /> significant cumulative macro-scale impact. As such, impacts related to emissions of GHG are inherently considered <br /> cumulative impacts. <br /> Estimated GHG emissions attributable to future development would be primarily associated with increases of carbon <br /> dioxide(CO2)and, to a lesser extent, other GHG pollutants, such as methane (CH4)and nitrous oxide(N2O)associated <br /> with area sources, mobile sources or vehicles, utilities(electricity and natural gas),water usage,wastewater generation, <br /> and the generation of solid waste. The primary source of GHG emissions for the project would be mobile source <br /> emissions. The common unit of measurement for GHG is expressed in terms of annual metric tons of CO2 equivalents <br /> (MTCO2e/yr). <br /> The SJVAPCD has adopted the Guidance for Valley Land-use Agencies in Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for New <br /> Projects under CEQA and the District Policy—Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for Stationary Source Projects Under <br /> CEQA When Serving as the Lead Agency.11 The guidance and policy rely on the use of performance-based standards, <br /> otherwise known as Best Performance Standards (BPS) to assess significance of project specific greenhouse gas <br /> emissions on global climate change during the environmental review process, as required by CEQA.To be determined <br /> to have a less-than-significant individual and cumulative impact with regard to GHG emissions, projects must include <br /> BPS sufficient to reduce GHG emissions by 29 percent when compared to Business As Usual (BAU) GHG emissions. <br /> Per the SJVAPCD, BAU is defined as projected emissions for the 2002-2004 baseline period. Projects which do not <br /> achieve a 29 percent reduction from BAU levels with BPS alone are required to quantify additional project-specific <br /> reductions demonstrating a combined reduction of 29 percent. Potential mitigation measures may include, but not <br /> limited to: on-site renewable energy (e.g. solar photovoltaic systems), electric vehicle charging stations, the use of <br /> alternative-fueled vehicles, exceeding Title 24 energy efficiency standards, the installation of energy-efficient lighting <br /> and control systems, the installation of energy-efficient mechanical systems, the installation of drought-tolerant <br /> landscaping, efficient irrigation systems, and the use of low-flow plumbing fixtures. <br /> It should be noted that neither the SJVAPCD nor the County provide project-level thresholds for construction-related <br /> GHG emissions. Construction GHG emissions are a one-time release and are, therefore, not typically expected to <br /> generate a significant contribution to global climate change.As such,the analysis herein is limited to discussion of long- <br /> term operational GHG emissions. <br /> 11 San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. Guidance for Valley Land-use Agencies in Addressing GHG Emission <br /> Impacts for New Projects under CEQA. December 17, 2009.San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District. District Policy <br /> Addressing GHG Emission Impacts for Stationary Source Projects Under CEQA When Serving as the Lead Agency. <br /> December 17, 2009. <br /> PA-1900031 and PA-1900037—Initial Study 15 <br />