My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012692
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
F
>
5491
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545028
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012692
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2019 5:54:55 PM
Creation date
12/6/2019 2:59:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012692
RECORD_ID
PR0545028
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003919
FACILITY_NAME
VAN DE POL ENTERPRISES
STREET_NUMBER
5491
STREET_NAME
F
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
BANTA
Zip
95304
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
5491 F ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
376
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WE <br /> n - <br /> PROBLEM ASSESSMENT REPORT <br /> Moore Petroleum, Inc. <br /> 5941 F Street, Banta, LA <br /> - NGA Project No. 10-90-481 <br /> Page 12 <br /> Two scenarios were modeled using DREAM. Scenario 1 consists of <br /> pumping MW-1 at a rate of 4 gallons per minute (gpm) . Scenario 2 <br /> consists of pumping MW-1 at the same rate but injecting treated <br /> ground water via a new monitoring well (NW-7) located outside the <br /> .interpreted extent of dissolved hydrocarbons in ground water. <br /> Scenario 2 assumes that dissolved hydrocarbons will not be detected <br /> at MW-7 and that its location will be .suitable for injection of <br /> treated ground water. Input parameters to DREAM utilized for <br /> modeling both scenarios are given in Table 6. <br /> TABLE 6 <br /> DREAM Input Parameters <br /> Scenario 1 Scenario 2 <br /> Pumping well MW-1 MW-1 <br /> Injection well None MW-7. <br /> - <br /> Pumping Rate 4 gpm 4 gpm <br /> A^ Injection Rate None 4 gpm <br /> ` nq, ifer Transmissivity 520 gallons/day/foot 520 gpti/foot <br /> - Natural Ground-Water .004 foot/foot .004 foot/foot <br /> Gradient <br /> Aquifer Thickness <br /> -.L feet 20 feet s <br /> Aquifer Porosity 0.25 0.25 <br /> Examination of the tables of drawdowns generated by DREAM for both <br /> - ld be maintained <br /> scenarios indicate that a pumping rate of 4 gpm cou <br /> at MW-1. Figure 8 shows ground water .flowlines generated by DREAM <br /> for scenario 1. Examination of Figure 8 indicates that this <br /> scenario would easily capture the interpreted extent of dissolved <br /> hydrocarbons and prevent further ,migration of the dissolved plume. i <br /> Figure 9 is a contour map of ground-water travel times produced by <br /> pumping under Scenario 1, Figure 9 shows that while a significant <br /> 7. <br /> portion of thedissolved plume Mould reach VW-1 in less than 100 <br /> days, the most down-gradient portion of the plume (east of MW-3) <br /> would require about 850 days to reach MW-1. - <br /> x, Because of adsorption and desorpti6A of hydrocarbon constituents <br /> -------- -- by---aquifer---materials--_-(part.icu.larly --fine-grain ed sediments and <br /> -' organic material) it is likely that petroleum constituents w ll- --- - <br /> —---- <br /> migrate somewhat .slower than ground water. A conservative estimate <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.