Laserfiche WebLink
PRELRYDNARY HYDROGEOLOGIC ASSESSMENT REPORT <br /> 5491 "F Street, Banta, California <br /> Delta Project No. 44-88-481 <br /> Page 7 <br /> predominantly sand, clay, silty clay, and silty sand. The uppermost layer is a silty clay that is underlain <br /> by fine- to medium-grained sand. A silty clay/clayey silt occurs below the sand and is underlain by sand <br /> and silty sand. The sand and silty sand were the deepest units penetrated at the site. A geologic cross- <br /> section, presented in Figure 5, was constructed from the soil boring logs. The cross-section locations are <br /> shown in Figure 6. Copies of the soil boring logs are included in Appendix B. <br /> 3.3 Regional Hydro eog logy <br /> Ground water in the Sacramento Valley occurs in both confined and unconfined aquifers. Confined <br /> ground water tends to be located in older and deeper formations. Unconfined water can be found in <br /> alluvial fan, flood plains, and stream channel deposits. Ground water is found at shallower depths in the <br /> et),and deeper toward the basin margins,where it occurs <br /> central part of the Sacramento tiyalley Basin (5 fe <br /> at depths greater than 100 feet. Regional ground water flow at the site is in a northeasterly direction <br /> toward the Tom Paine Slough. (DWR Bulletin 146, 1967). Recharge to the water table occurs through <br /> deep percolation of water from streams, rain, snowfall, and irrigation. <br /> .s Ground water quality throughout the valley is sufficient for most uses. Ground water in the eastern half <br /> of the valley is of better quality, with respect to mineral content, than water from the western side of the <br /> valley. On the west side,where rocks of the Coast Range contain many soluble minerals and saline water, <br /> high concentrations of sodium, chloride, and sulfate in the ground water may render it unsuitable for <br /> irrigation and drinking (DWR Bulletin 118-6, 1978). <br /> 3A Zite Hydrogeology <br /> On April 28, 1989, two monitoring well borings were advanced and completed as ground water monitoring <br /> wells MW-2 and MW-3. The construction details of these wells are presented in Appendix A_ In addition <br /> to monitoring wells MW-2 and MW-3, monitoring well MW-1 was previously installed by ETS. <br /> The depth to ground water at the site was measured on May 12, May 24, and June 27, 1989. <br /> Measurements were made from the top of the casing. After the May 12, 1989, monitoring event, the <br /> casing elevations were altered and resurveyed. Monitoring well MW-3 was arbitrarily assigned an elevation <br /> of 100 feet above sea level. As a result the water level data from the May 12, 1989, event is <br /> noncorrellative with data from the May 24, 1989, event (Table 5). Differences in the , ater level between <br /> the monitoring wells for an individual monitoring event are correlative. A water table contour map, <br /> based on the May 24, 1989, water level monitoring event, is presented in Figure 7. <br />