My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011876
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
F
>
5491
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545028
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011876
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/6/2019 5:44:32 PM
Creation date
12/6/2019 4:50:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011876
RECORD_ID
PR0545028
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003919
FACILITY_NAME
VAN DE POL ENTERPRISES
STREET_NUMBER
5491
STREET_NAME
F
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
BANTA
Zip
95304
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
5491 F ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Limited Subsurface Site Investigation Results Report <br /> Moore Petroleum Bulk Plant,5491 F Street,Banta,San Joaquin County,California <br /> Page 3 <br /> July 25 - 26, 2000 - Apex personnel supervised the installation of three groundwater monitoring <br /> r✓ wells (MW-10, MW-11, and MW-12). The results of all soil and water sampling were <br /> documented in Results Report for Limited Subsurface Investigation and Third Quarter 2000 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report, dated August 25, 2000. <br /> November 17, 2000 - Apex submitted Workplan for Interim Remediation &fourth Quarter 2000 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report, proposing the installation of three recovery wells and one <br /> vapor extraction well, using the three recovery wells for a pumping test. SJCEHD responded and <br /> only wanted one recovery well installed for the pumping test and depending on the results, more <br /> recovery wells could be installed. <br /> 5 <br /> January 8, 2001 - Apex supervised the installation of one vapor extraction well (VEW-2) and one <br /> groundwater recovery well (RW-2). Results of the well installation are documented in Results <br /> Report for Limited Subsurface Investigation and First Quarter 2001 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> Report, dated March 9, 2001. <br /> March 2001 - Apex performed a pumping test utilizing well RW-2. The results of the pumping <br /> test were reported in Apex's Second Quarter 2001 Monitoring Report and Interim Remediation <br /> Plan, dated June 1, 2001. <br /> August 24, 2001 - Apex over-drilled and reconstructed well MW-7 as a vapor extraction well. <br /> On September 12, 2001, Apex personnel installed the remediation piping connecting wells MW- <br /> 7, VEW-4, VEW-2, and VEW-3 to the remediation compound. <br /> June 2002 - Construction and assembly of the vapor extraction system was completed. The <br /> official start-up of the system was on June 17, 2002 as reported in the Source Test Results <br /> Report, dated July 31, 2002, and Remediation Status Report, dated October 4, 2002. <br /> September 26, 2003 - Apex submitted a workplan that recommended in-situ chemical oxidation <br /> by ozone sparging to remove the total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd)/motor oil (mo) <br /> TPHmo mass from the soil and groundwater. <br /> November 10, 2003 - An addendum to the workplan was requested in a letter by the SJCEHD to <br /> increase the scope of work to further delineate the hydrocarbon plume by installing additional <br /> monitoring wells. Technical data on the ozone system and the spacing of the sparge points was <br /> also requested. On January 14, 2004, Apex submitted Addendum to Workplan for Ozone <br /> Sparging. <br /> January 14, 2004 - Apex submitted Workplan for a Limited Subsurface Site Investigation, <br /> proposing the installation of five additional groundwater monitoring wells. <br /> May 12, 2004 - The SJCEHD responded to the Addendum to Workplan for Ozone Sparging, by <br /> approving the proposed ozone sparge wells and requested an addendum to the workplan, <br /> proposing an additional cone penetration testing (CPT) boring and relocation of the proposed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.