Laserfiche WebLink
Riddle & Isola, P.C. <br /> A Professional Corporation <br /> Quail Lakes Executive Office Park Telephone: (209) 952-6262 <br /> 2291 W. March Lane, Suite 100D " ' Facsimile: (209) 952-9891 <br /> Stockton, California 95207 'i Dail: RiddleIsola@Earthlink.net <br /> May 8, 1997 <br /> Ms. Donna Heran, Director <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor <br /> P.O. Box 388 <br /> Stockton, California <br /> Re: Michael Souza Property (APN: 238-080-01) Lammers and Byron <br /> Road Tracy, California: Further Regulatory Action <br /> Dear Ms. Heran: <br /> This office represents Mr. Michael Souza regarding the environmental issues surrounding the <br /> above-referenced real property ("Property"). The purpose of this letter is to pursue a request <br /> for a no further action letter from your office with respect to the Property. <br /> In December, 1994, Mr. Souza voluntarily undertook a subsurface investigation of the <br /> Property to determine the environmental impact, if any, to the Property resulting from <br /> releases of hazardous waste from the nearby Chevron pipeline. Mr. Souza's voluntary <br /> investigation included sampling soils and groundwater at three monitoring wells installed on <br /> the Property. Groundwater was sampled from the monitoring wells two additional times, for a <br /> total of three groundwater sampling episodes. Except for the detection of polynuclear aromatic <br /> hydrocarbons during the first sampling episode, all subsequent sampling episodes have shown <br /> all analytes to be below detection limits (See, February 3, 1995 Mill Creek Report enclosed <br /> herewith). <br /> Additionally, this office corresponded by letter dated April 7, 1997, with Ms. Wendy Cohen of <br /> the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) regarding her position <br /> on the need for additional environmental investigation at the Property. In a responding <br /> telephone call, Ms. Cohen explained that her office has no regulatory jurisdiction over the <br /> Property because she believes no contamination or threat of contamination to groundwater <br /> exists at the Property. As a result, Ms. Cohen represented that her office has no say over any <br /> environmental investigation at the property. Thus, according to the CVRWQCB, no <br /> contamination or threat of contamination exists at the Property sufficient to cause the <br /> CVRWQCB to act. <br />