Laserfiche WebLink
Y <br /> i <br /> pygal <br /> i <br /> Injection well. An iniectiun well is the Apposite of an extraction well in that water is <br /> pumped into the yell and returned to the aquifer. Water moves out from the well into <br /> the unsaturated soil or groundwater, depending on the location of the well screen. An <br /> injection well may be used instead of an infiltration gallery where the water must be <br /> ;,. injected to a specific desired subsurface location. <br /> Injection wells may be constructed similar to extraction wells, but a discharge pipe <br /> extends into the water instead of a pump. Wells are subject to clogging as the injected <br /> water mixes with formation water and velocities drop. Typically, the specific capacity <br /> for injection is less than 50 percent of the specific capacity for extraction from a well. <br /> To compensate for the reduced efficiency, more wells or greater head must be <br /> supplied. <br /> The high TDS content and hardness of groundwater at the Disco site indicates than s <br /> injection wells may clog rapidly and irreversibly.' For this reason,injectioni uveIls are not <br /> recommended. <br /> _ Infiltration Galleries. After above-ground groundwater treatment,groundwater may be <br /> reinjected back into the subsurface via an infiltration gallery. The infiltration gallery is <br /> similar to a ]each field, consisting of a gravel-filled trench through which water may <br /> infiltrate into the soil and eventually the groundwater. <br /> The infiltration rate is determined by percolation tests or estimated from saturated <br /> .. hydraulic conductivity values(from pumping tests.on wells). The gallery.is designed to <br /> allow all water to percolate at a unit gradient (i.e., no applied head); the soil remains <br /> f unsaturated. <br /> Because infilt,:ation galleries can be easily constructed with excess capacity, they are <br /> generally less susceptible to clogging than; inier_tiun wells. Infiltration galleries are also <br /> cheaper to construct and operate and can be easily enlarged if necessary. For these <br /> ` reasons, an infiltration gallery is recommended for the Disco site. <br /> Remedial Alternatives <br /> The above described options can be combined into remedial alternatives for the Disco <br /> site. All recommended alternatives include: <br /> y Groundwater monitoring <br /> • One sparging well in the contamination source area to stimulate <br /> w biodegradation and volatilization of hydrocarbons at and above the water <br /> table <br /> • Groundwater extraction wells in and-downgradient of the source area-to <br /> control migration and remove contaminated water <br /> SF0316 ARR007.5I 4_6 <br /> e <br />