My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010837
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FILBERT
>
110
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545039
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010837
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2019 1:35:21 PM
Creation date
12/10/2019 10:52:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010837
RECORD_ID
PR0545039
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0010186
FACILITY_NAME
DEL MONTE FOODS PLNT #33 - DISCO WH
STREET_NUMBER
110
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
FILBERT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15702009
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
110 N FILBERT ST
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
k" KLEINFELDER <br /> f' <br /> 4 ACTIVITIES CONDUCTED <br /> Kleinfelder conducted the groundwater sampling for the fourth quarter 2002 groundwater <br /> monitoring. Kleinfelder measured water levels in all of the monitoring wells , and sampled the <br /> monitoring wells (MW-DIS-11s, MW-DIS-11d, MW-DIS-12, MW-DIS-13, MW-DIS- 14s, and <br /> MW-DIS-14d). All of the wells were previously surveyed by Kjeldson, Sinnock, Neudeck, Inc. <br /> (KSN, Inc.) of Stockton, California so groundwater gradients could be calculated. Data obtained <br /> from the wells was used to evaluate groundwater flow, groundwater impacts and the need for <br /> additional assessment. <br /> 4.1 MEASUREMENT OF WATER LEVELS <br /> In order to assess the groundwater gradient at the time of sampling, water level measurements <br /> were made in each of the 20 monitoring wells and 3 piezometers at the beginning of the sampling <br /> round, prior to purging and sampling of the wells (see the attached Record of Water Levels). The <br /> depth-to-water was measured in each well according to the protocol described in Appendix A, <br /> Section A-4.1. The depth-to-water measurements were then converted to relative groundwater <br /> elevations with respect to a surveyed benchmark by subtracting them from the surveyed casing <br /> l elevations. <br /> J The resulting pertinent groundwater elevations were used to assess the direction of the <br /> groundwater flow and gradient at the time of sampling. This information was then used to assess <br /> which wells represent upgradient and which wells represent downgradient groundwater <br /> conditions. See Table 1 for the groundwater elevation data. <br /> Plates 2 shows the location of theoundwater monitoring e <br /> gr g w lls. Groundwater elevations for the <br /> monitoring wells ranged from —33.54 feet (MW-$d) to -34.19 feet (MW-13). A groundwater <br /> gradient and direction was calculated based on depth-to-water data collected from these wells on <br /> December 9, 2002, and by data collected during a survey produced by KSN Inc. on February 14, <br /> 2002. The groundwater flow direction is estimated to be towards the southeast at a relatively flat <br /> gradient of approximately 0.0005 ft./ft. A groundwater contour map is included as Plate 3. In <br /> areas of flat groundwater gradients such as this site, groundwater flow directions may <br /> significantly fluctuate due to rainfall, groundwater recharge, groundwater pumping, etc.. <br /> Therefore, changes in groundwater flow directions may vary at this site with time, however, past <br /> data consistently has suggested a similar groundwater gradient and flow direction. <br /> 12280.MON/ST03R225 Page 6 of 12 <br /> 2003,Kleinfelder,Inc February 5,2003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.