Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Table 2 <br /> 1 Summary of Groundwater Flow Directions and Gradients <br /> Del Monte Plant 33 <br /> Flow Direction Gradient* <br /> Date (Azimuth),Degrees* ftlft <br /> 9-Sep-91 350(N) 0.001 <br /> r 23-Sep-91 300(NW) 0.001 <br /> ` Oct-91 315(NW) 0.0007 <br /> f Jan-92 340(N) 0.0004 <br /> 1 Jun-92 344(N) 0.0005 <br /> Oct-92 ND' ND <br /> I Jan-93 20(N) 0.0003 <br /> Mar-93 56(NE) 0.0003 <br /> Jul-93 320(NW) 0.001 <br /> I Sep-93 300(NW) 0.0003 <br /> I Jan-94 285(NW) 0.0003 <br /> Apt-94 NDa NDa <br /> Jul-94 255(W) 0.0007 <br /> Oct-94 ND ND <br /> Mar-95 ND` ND` <br /> Jun-95 ND` ND` <br /> Oct-95 160(SE) 0.0013 <br /> Feb-96 145(SE) 0.0009 <br /> Jun-96 NDa NDa <br /> Aug-96 160(SE) 0.0010 <br /> Dec-96 115(SE) 0,0015 <br /> Apr-97 133(SE) 0.0010 <br /> Aug-97 NDa NDa <br /> f Dec-97 138(SE) 0.001 <br /> Apr-98 132(SE) 0.0009 <br /> May-98 132(SE) 0.0009 <br /> Jul-98 175(S) 0.0010 <br /> Nov-98 150 SE 0.0006 <br /> NC-Water level data were not collected. <br /> i ND-Not Determined <br /> *The groundwater flow direction and magnitude results are visual averages <br /> based on the general contour patterns. <br /> I a Groundwater flow direction and gradient were not determined using this data <br /> since flow directions were highly variable across the site. <br /> b Groundwater flow direction and gradient were not determined using this data <br /> i as the water table was essentially flat. <br /> Groundwater flow direction and gradient were not determined using this data <br /> as SVElsparging remediation system was operating,and flow directions <br /> were inward toward the Disco site. <br /> I <br /> 4 1122199 Gwgmd33.xls <br /> I <br />