Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Table 2 <br /> Summary of Groundwater Flow Directions and Gradients <br /> Del Monte Plant 33 <br /> / Flow Direction Gradient* <br /> Date (Azimuth),De rees* (ft/ft) <br /> 9-Sep-91 350(N) 0.001 <br /> 23-Sep-91 300(NW) 0.001 <br /> Oct-91 315(NW) 0.0007 <br /> Jan-92 340(N) 0.0004 <br /> Jun-92 344(N) 0.0005 <br /> Oct-92 ND ND <br /> Jan-93 20(N) 0.0003 <br /> Mar-93 56(NE) 0.0003 <br /> + Jul-93 320(NW) 0.001 <br /> Sep-93 300(NW) 0.0003 <br /> Jan-94 285(NW) 0.0003 <br /> Apr-94 NDa NDa <br /> Jul-94 255(W) 0.0007 <br /> Oct-94 ND ND <br /> Mar-95 ND` ND` <br /> Jun-95 ND` ND` <br /> Oct-95 160(SE) 0.0013 <br /> Feb-96 145(SE) 0.0009 <br /> Jun-96 ND" ND' <br /> Aug-96 160(SE) 0.0010 <br /> Dec-96 115(SE) 0.0015 <br /> Apr-97 133(SE) 0.0010 <br /> Aug-97 ND" NDa <br /> Dec-97 138(SE) 0.001 <br /> Apr-98 132(SE) 0.0009 <br /> May-98 132(SE) 0.0009 <br /> Jul-98 175(S) 0.0010 <br /> Nov-98 150(SE) 0.0006 <br /> Feb-99 129(SE) 0.0007 <br /> Jul-99 150(SE) 0.0008 <br /> NC-Water level data were not collected. <br /> ND-Not Determined <br /> y *The groundwater flow direction and magnitude results are visual averages <br /> based on the general contour patterns. <br /> a Groundwater flow direction and gradient were not determined using this data <br /> } since flow directions were highly variable across the site. <br /> b Groundwater flow direction and gradient were not determined using this data <br /> as the water table was essentially flat. <br /> ` Groundwater flow direction and gradient were not determined using this data <br /> as SVElsparging remediation system was operating,and flow directions <br /> were inward toward the Disco site. <br /> 9!26!99 <br /> Gw8 rad33.xls <br />