Laserfiche WebLink
l 2 <br /> r <br /> 1994) for completing exploratory groundwater sampling,well installation,pump testing, <br /> and preparation of a Final Remediation Plan. <br /> In April 1995,Del Monte submitted a Problem Assessment Report and Final Remediation <br /> Plan(PAR/FRP)to describe the supplemental investigation. The PAR/FRP followed the <br /> guidelines of the Tri-Regional Board Staff Recommendations for Preliminary Evaluation and <br /> Investigation of Underground Tank Sites,Appendix A-Reports (Central Valley Regional Water <br /> Quality Control Board,1991). <br /> At the direction of PHS/EHD,Del Monte is conducting quarterly groundwater monitoring <br /> (since 1991), operating an active remediation system at the Disco site (since February 1995), <br /> and conducting a 1-year ITB demonstration. The remediation system consists of air <br /> sparging and soil vapor extraction(AS/SVE). A work plan was submitted to PHS/EHD for <br /> the installation of two multi-purpose monitoring wells in the source area,which were <br /> installed on December 11 and 15, 1995. <br /> Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Results <br /> Quarterly groundwater samples and water level measurements were collected on February <br /> 13,April 18,and June 6, 1996. <br /> Groundwater Gradient <br /> Water levels were measured by Del-Tech of Oakdale,California,while the AS/SVE system <br /> was not in operation. Table 1 presents shallow groundwater surface elevations for each well <br /> measured since September 1991.Table 1 includes top-of-screen(TOS)elevations to point <br /> out that the water level is above the top of well screens in all of the Disco site monitoring <br /> wells. As indicated in Table 1,water levels have risen by approximately 5 feet since the <br /> previous monitoring event. Figures 2A,2B,and 2C show an interpretation of shallow <br /> groundwater elevation contours which indicate that the groundwater is flowing in a <br /> southerly direction. <br /> BTEX Analytical Results <br /> Table 2 presents analyses of groundwater samples from monitoring wells. Laboratory <br /> reports and chain of custody forms are attached. MW-DIS-2 was sampled by two different <br /> methods and analyzed by different laboratories.The samples collected on February 13,and <br /> June 6, 1996 were taken after a rapid well purge typical for quarterly monitoring. The <br /> sample collected on April 19,1996 was taken after minimum aeration purging used for <br /> intrinsic bioremediation demonstration monitoring. As expected,the samples collected by <br /> minimum aeration technique show BTEX concentrations higher than,but in the same order <br /> of magnitude as,the concentrations reported for the rapid purge sample. <br /> As reported in the fall quarter 1995,the BTEX results for MW-DIS-2(sample collected <br /> 10/18/95)do not fit the data trend.The results from this quarter provide further evidence <br /> that the 10/18/95 sample or laboratory analysis procedure was flawed. We recommend <br /> excluding this data point from further data consideration. <br /> A column was added to Table 2 for sample dilution per the request of PHS/EHD. <br /> SFoIC.%PROJECTSCELMONTE1109MOOl_DOC <br />