My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0002788
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
3032
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SA-96-09
>
SU0002788
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2019 8:37:07 PM
Creation date
12/10/2019 2:34:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0002788
PE
2633
FACILITY_NAME
SA-96-09
STREET_NUMBER
3032
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
ENTERED_DATE
11/1/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
3032 E WATERLOO RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Z COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT <br /> a: .A <br /> A 1810 E.HAZELTON AVE.,STOCKTON.CA 95205-6232 <br /> cq�iFo,R��P PHONE:209/468-3121 Fax:209/468-3163 <br /> June 26, 1998 <br /> Gurpal Sidhu <br /> 3032 E. Waterloo Road <br /> Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> Dear Mr. Sidhu: <br /> Re: Revisions of Approved Actions for Site Approval Application No. SA-96-9 of Gurpal Sidhu (APN: 143- <br /> 140-30; 3032 E. Waterloo Road, Stockton) <br /> ACTION: On June 26, 1998, the San Joaquin County Community Development Department denied the <br /> above-referenced application due to the inability to make required Findings 1, 3, and 5, as follows: <br /> 1. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, policies, standards, and maps of <br /> the General Plan, any applicable Master Plan, Specific plan, and Special <br /> Purpose Plan, and any other applicable plan adopted by the County. <br /> • This finding cannot be made because omitting the requirement for <br /> a solid masonry wall is inconsistent with Development Title <br /> Section 9-1022.4[e][1]. <br /> • This finding cannot be made because if the revision is approved, it <br /> would result in substandard truck parking spaces that would not <br /> comply with Development Title Section 9-1015[c][1]. <br /> 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development and for the intensity of <br /> development. <br /> • This finding cannot be made because the site is not large enough to <br /> accommodate the number of trucks proposed in the Revisions of <br /> Approved Actions application. <br /> 5. The use is compatible with adjoining land uses. <br /> • This finding cannot be made because development of the site with <br /> commercial uses that are not properly screened consistent with <br /> County Ordinance will be incompatible with adjacent residential land <br /> uses. <br /> APPEAL PERIOD: This action can be appealed to the Planning Commission by any <br /> interested party. Appeals must be filed with this Department within 10 days of the action with <br /> an appeal fee of$275.00. The 10-day appeal period ends at 4:30 p.m. on July 6, 1998. If <br /> this date falls on a weekend or holiday, the appeal period will expire on the next regular <br /> business day at 4:30 p.m. <br /> Please contact me if you have any questions(468-9567). <br /> Sincerely, <br /> U 5Llsj r�_ <br /> KAI LUOMA <br /> Assistant Planner <br /> KL/blm <br /> Enclosure: Map <br /> cc: Department of Public Works Building Inspection Division <br /> Public Health Services County Assessor <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.