My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011657
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FIRST
>
1116
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545046
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011657
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2019 5:56:35 PM
Creation date
12/10/2019 4:42:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011657
RECORD_ID
PR0545046
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003700
FACILITY_NAME
CITY OF STOCKTON FIRE STATION #3
STREET_NUMBER
1116
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
FIRST
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
APN
16903006
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1116 E FIRST ST
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C- \TATC <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> top of the well screen. Analytical results indicated the presence of petroleum hydrocarbons. <br /> Results are summarized in AGE'S Quarterly Report-July 1998. <br /> In March 1999, ATC supervised the advancement of two soil borings at the site and the borings <br /> were subsequently completed as groundwater monitoring wells MW2 and MW3. Analytical data <br /> indicated that soil samples collected from wells MW2 and MW3 contained no detectable <br /> concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons. The groundwater sample collected from well MW2 <br /> contained trace amounts of toluene. The March 1999 subsurface investigation results are detailed <br /> in ATC's Summary Report of Groundwater Monitoring Well Installations, dated June 3, 1999. <br /> SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> On December 2, 1999, groundwater samples were collected by ATC Associates personnel from <br /> monitoring wells MW 1 through MW3. The locations of the monitoring wells are shown on <br /> Figure 2. Prior to collection of groundwater samples, the depth to water, pH, electrical <br /> conductivity, and temperature were measured in the monitoring wells and recorded. A minimum <br /> of three well casing volumes were purged from each well prior to sampling. The wells were <br /> allowed to recover and samples were collected from each well using dedicated disposable bailers. <br /> The groundwater samples collected from each well were submitted to State-certified Sequoia <br /> `.. Analytical (FLAP Cert. No. 1210) for chemical analysis of total petroleum hydrocarbons as <br /> gasoline (TPHg), utilizing EPA methods 8015 modified, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and <br /> xylenes (BTEX)utilizing EPA methods 8020, and oxygenate fuel additives utilizing EPA method <br /> 8260. Groundwater well purge and sample logs are contained in Attachment 1. <br /> ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> The groundwater samples collected from wells MW1, MW2, and MW3 contained no detectable <br /> concentrations of TPHg or BTEX. The groundwater samples collected from wells MW2 and <br /> MW3 contained no detectable concentrations of oxygenate fuel additives. The groundwater <br /> sample collected from well MW 1 contained methyl tertiary butyl ether(MTBE) at a concentration <br /> of 39.8 parts per billion (ppb). Analytical results of groundwater samples are summarized in <br /> Table 2. Laboratory data sheets and chain-of-custody documentation are contained in <br /> Attachment 2. <br /> GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION <br /> Water level measurements were collected from wells MWl through MW3 on December 2, 1999. <br /> Water levels ranged from 36.61 to 37.14 feet below the top of well casing elevations, representing <br /> an average decrease in the water table elevation of approximately 0.80 feet since September 1999. <br /> The water level data were used to develop the groundwater elevation contour map (Figure 3). <br /> Assuming that horizontal isotropic conditions prevail, groundwater in the uppermost aquifer <br /> u beneath the site flowed towards the east. The average hydraulic gradient on December 2, 1999 <br /> w:\62574\62574.05\reports\4gr-1999.doc 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.