Laserfiche WebLink
C PAGE 03 <br /> 10/22/2003 14:24 209-579-2"^5 MODESTO ATf <br />� <br /> 'CVA <br /> rc <br /> I; <br /> I In September 1999, ATC supervised the advancement of soil borings SB-11, SB-12, and SB-13 at <br /> locations approximately 15 feet northwest, south, and northeast of well MW4 respectively. <br /> Analytical data indicated the groundwater sample from soil boring SB-12 was impacted with TPM at <br /> a concentration of 24,000 ppb. The groundwater samples from SB-11 and SB-13 contained very low <br /> to nondetectable concentrations of TPHd. Results of laboratory analyses performed on selected soil <br /> samples indicate that TPHd was present in only the samples corrected between 14 and 16.5 feet bga <br /> 1 Field observations indicated that the samples at these depths also exhibited the i highest FID <br /> measurements. Soil sampler SB11-15.5, SB12-16.5, and SB13-14.0 contained detectable <br /> concentrations of TPHd at 390 ppm, 290 ppm, and 1,100 ppm, respectively. All the remaining soil <br /> samples were not detected. ,The September 1999 subsurface investigation activities are detailed in <br /> ATC's Summary Report, Subsurface Investigadon,dated January 10, 2000. <br /> A groundwater pumping test was conducted during a 24-hour period starting on July 22, 1999 and <br /> ending July 23, 1999. The goal of the groundwater pump test was to provide aquifer data necessary to <br /> characterize the feasibility of operating a groundwater treatment system at the site. The radius of <br /> influence of groundwater extraction, groundwater drawdown hydrogeologic properties of the aquifer, <br /> and the mass extraction rate of groundwater were to be determined by this pumping test. The results <br /> of the groundwaterm <br /> pu ping test showed the radius of influence for groundwater extraction at the site <br /> is greater than 50 feet. Hydrogeologic properties of the aquifer, specifically, hydraulic conductivity <br /> (1), transmissivity (T), and the coefficient of storage (S) were measured. The average hydraulic <br /> conductivity (K) was calculated to be 0.001 meters/seoond, the average transmissivity (T) was <br /> calculated to be 6.79 square feet/minute, the Coefficient of Storage (S)was calculated using Cooper- <br /> Jacob solution to be 0.0015. In addition, based on analytical results of samples taken during the <br /> groundwater pumping test, 6,000 gallons of groundwater were extracted from the subsurface, and <br /> 0.00005 lbs. of TPHd were removed from the subsurface during the twenty-four hour test. The <br /> groundwater pumping test activities are detailed in the Summary Report ofPumpb{g Test, dated <br /> 1 September 19, 2000, <br /> 1 FIELD WORK <br /> From April 4 to June 30, 2003, static fluid levels were measured on generally a weekly or bi- <br /> weekly basis in monitoring wells MWl through MW7. This occurred during groundwater <br /> extraction activities located on the northern adjacent property. On August 12, 2003, after <br /> groundwater extraction activities terminated, static fluid levels were again measured after the <br /> groundwater table bad a chance to equilibrate. Table 1 summarizes the water level data collected <br /> during the reporting period and provides previous data for comparison. <br /> A groundwater gradient map was created for,each monitoring event (Figures 2 through 10) using <br /> groundwater elevation data from all the wells monitored. Figures 2 through 9 depict a generally <br /> north groundwater flow direction at a magnitude of which ranged from 0.04 to 0.07 or 211 to <br /> r 370 feet/mile. Figure 10 depicted a generally north groundwater flow direction at a magnitude of <br /> i 0.01 or 53 feet/mile, <br /> a <br /> w:w2574.0quwUy3qw2007.dac 3 <br />