Laserfiche WebLink
�=0"- - Na <br /> r <br /> a s. <br /> {aG <br /> filling to grade with neat cement. The location of the four <br /> wells and two soil borings is shown on Figure 2. The drill <br /> cuttings were stored adjacent to the u/g tank and covered <br /> with plastic sheeting. <br /> Subsequent to completion, the wellheads were surveyed to a <br /> common datum and groundwater levels monitored to determine <br /> the site specific groundwater gradient. Depth to <br /> F-= groundwater was measured in accordance with WaterWork's <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Protocol (Appendix III). The wellhead <br /> survey and groundwater monitoring data is presented in Table <br /> 3.2 Soil Sampling <br /> Grab iamples of cuttings wrre logged continuously during <br /> drilling for identification of stratigraphy and detection of <br /> hydrocarbon contamination. Field screening of volatile <br /> �., �?rganics emitted from the soils was conducted with a <br /> pftotoionization detector (PID) . The PID readings are <br /> plotted adjacent to the soils tested on the well log <br /> (Appendix 1). Discrete samples 'were: . taken at .five""foot <br /> intervals .to the ,water : table::starting at :five:: feet.' below <br /> grade. These samples were collected in two' inoh� 'diameter <br /> brass tubes using a California modified sampler. Samples <br /> - were cvlleoted, preserved and transported under chain-of- <br /> custody in accordance with WaterWork's Soil, ;Sampling <br /> Protocol (Appendix II). _ <br /> `from each boring -.wras: analyse arenzainiz'toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene 'and ,xylenes (BTEX) .b EPA'.:8020 ' and total- Mehews <br /> petroleum hydros se TPH-Dj -by 'Cal �Q� - <br /> alth Services test methodology: The minimum <br /> tection level for SEX in soil samples analyzed by E.C.C�!, <br /> aboratories is 0.02 ppm; for <br /> TP <br /> in soil samples, 10.0 ppm. <br /> 3.3 Groundwa er <br /> br. <br /> Subsequent to installation and well development, water c'� <br /> samples were collected from the monitoring wells after `{ <br /> purging a minimum of four well volumes <br /> pack) from each well. The purging lo (arepresented in � <br /> sing and sand ref <br /> Appendix IV. The p g g gs n <br /> parameters electrical conductivity (£C), <br /> W pH and temperature was checked during purging, and before <br /> �j and after sample collection to ensure samples collected are-/- E <br /> �- representative of formation water. d water was <br /> ischar ed directly into the facilities sewer line which Ppb <br /> is pied to t e waste water treatment plant. Water sample `}tp <br /> collection, preservation and transportation under chain of <br /> custody was conducted in accordance with WaterWork's � <br /> Groundwater Sampling Protocol (Appendix. III). The water <br /> re lyzed for BTEX, and TPH- as diesel by EPA <br /> 5030/8015/ 20 he minimum detection level for BTEX in <br /> - s analyzed 'by Sequoia Analytical is 0.3 ppb; for <br /> TPH in wate samples, 30.0 ppb. Because the monitoring <br /> wells were 1 sated within 50 feet of sanitary sewer lines <br /> 3 <br />