Laserfiche WebLink
"%TC <br /> A S S 0 C i A T E S I N C <br /> Floating petroleum product has previously been observed in well MW4. On April 4, 2003, only a <br /> slight, unmeasurable sheen was observed in well MW4. No free product was recovered from the <br /> well because the quantity was too small to be collected into a bailer. During subsequent <br /> monitoring events, the sheen was not evident. Table 2 summarizes the product thickness <br /> measurements and volume of product removed from previous monitoring events. <br /> Groundwater samples were collected on April 11, 2003 from downgradient wells MW2 and <br /> MW6. ATC attempted to collect a sample from well MW7 but following purging, the well did <br /> not sufficiently recover due to the nearby dewatering. On May I9, June 30, and August 12, 2003 <br /> groundwater samples were collected from all wells on site, MW1 through MW7. Prior to sample <br /> collection, each sampled well was purged of a minimum of three well casing volumes of water. <br /> Purged water was contained in labeled 55-gallon drums (DOT H), and stored on site. <br /> Groundwater samples were collected after physical parameters (pH, temperature, and <br /> conductivity) were monitored and had stabilized. Dedicated disposable bailers with bottom- <br /> emptying devices were used to collect samples from the wells. Field purge logs are presented in <br /> Attachment 1, <br /> LABORATORY ANALYSES <br /> Collected groundwater samples were analyzed by Argon Laboratories,s, a State-certified <br /> laboratory, for total petroleum hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd) utilizing EPA method 8015. <br /> Analytical results are summarized in Table 3, Laboratory data sheets and chain-of-custody <br /> documentation are included in Attachment 2. <br /> Laboratory results indicate that TPHd was detected ingroundwater samples collected from well <br /> MW4 on May 19, June 30, and August 12, 2003 at concentrations of 1,300, 6,900, and 85 parts <br /> per.billion (ppb), respectively. Analysis of samples collected from wells MW2 and MW6 on April <br /> 11, 2003 and from wells MW1, MW2, MW3, MW5, MW6 and MW7 on May 19, June 30, and <br /> August 12, 2003, did not indicate the presence of TPHd above method detection limits. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> The detected concentrations of TPHd have been decreasing in groundwater samples collected <br /> over the last five months of monitoring events, indicating that the dewatering has not had an <br /> adverse affect on the plume and the plume has remained stable during the off-site dewatering <br /> period. When off-site dewatering was terminated concentrations of TPHd in groundwater <br /> samples from MW4 decreased. Based on the results of these monitoring events ATC <br /> recommends proceeding with site closure and recommends destruction of wells MW1 through <br /> MW7. <br /> wA62574.021quafilyL3gmr2002.doc 4 <br />