Laserfiche WebLink
Objections to Conditions of Approval <br /> MS-QO-127 <br /> Paye 1 . <br /> YJe , Tetra Diar.end , Inc . , orject to t'!.e follot.,inc_ conditions places: on our <br /> Application No . MS-90-127 . <br /> 1 . <br /> we believe that ordinance requirements placed on a remaining parcel are <br /> discretionary and therefor appealable . Sec . 66424 . 6 State Subdivision Map Act . <br /> 2 . We object to the following conditions specified by the Public Works de- <br /> partment in Par . le , lf , lg , 1h, and li , and to the fact that no refer- <br /> ence is rude to the primary access route for Parcel No . 1 . Our reasons <br /> are as follows, : <br /> 'e-a ) The access to this remaining parcel , which has already been approved <br /> in Application MS-88-85 , consists of a deeded easement , the validity of <br /> which has been recognized by the Superior Court of San Joaquin County . <br /> Tentative Parcel Map No . 76-89 . Court Order dated February 20, 1986 . <br /> b) To ask us to furnish an irrevocable offer to dedicate is illegal <br /> since it involves a third party and is something over which we have <br /> no jurisdiction. The County , however , does have jurisdiction in matters <br /> such as this through its powers of Eminent Domain . <br /> c) No provision is made concerning entitlements in Sec. 66424. 6 of the <br /> State Subdivision Map Act. <br /> if-a ) This is a remaining parcel which is agricultural in nature . There is <br /> no need for an all weather crossing at this time or until development takeE <br /> place . This was recognized in the conditions placed on Application <br /> No . MS-88-85 . Nothing has changed since then. <br /> Ig-a ) While we have no objection to doing this , our access to the remaining <br /> parcel will be as previously indicated in MS-88-85 and therefor it ks not <br /> necessary. <br /> lh-a ) This condition is irrelevant and unnecessary as no buildings are <br /> involved . This is clearly stated in the Section to which reference is <br /> made . <br /> li-a ) This condition concerns the same situation as that found in condition <br /> of par . if and does not pertain unless development takes place on the <br /> remaining parcel . <br /> The primary access road to Parcel 1 runs from Liberty Road , starting at a <br /> pointl/4 mile west of Sowles , north for 3/8 mile and thence west for 489 . 33 f <br /> where it joins Parcel 1 . The 3/8 mile is already under Irrevocable Offer to <br /> Dedicate and the same can be done for the 489 . 33 ft . strip if desired . This <br /> entire Easement is less than 1/2 mile in length. <br /> 3 . We object to the conditions placed in Paragraphs a , b, and c of Application <br /> No . MS-90-127 by Public Health Services for the following reasons : <br /> a . This is agricultural land . Septic tank disposal problems will not arise <br /> unless the owner indicates that he wishes to undertake domestic devel- <br /> opment . This condition belongs on a permit which he might be issued at <br /> that time, not here . From a practical standpoint , most septic tank dis- <br /> posal problems in this area are taken care of by deep, dry wells . This <br /> is the time to demonstrate permeability. <br /> b. Since this A' Plication does not involve development, wle.y is it nEceF -art, <br /> here? <br /> c . Same as b above . <br />