Laserfiche WebLink
6131 Pacific, Stockton Page 1 of 7 <br /> Raymond von Flue [EH] <br /> From: denis.1.brown@shelI.com <br /> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 11:08 AM <br /> To: Kasey Foley [EH] <br /> Cc: Margaret Lagorio [EH]; Raymond von Flue [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 6131 Pacific, Stockton <br /> Thanks for the further clarification. <br /> That would seem to complete the picture of when and where a test would need to follow. <br /> Sounds reasonable and your clarification helps put my mind at rest as to what site info. you will <br /> need to demand a test in follow up to work at these types of sites. <br /> Again, appreciate your responses and efforts to clarify. <br /> ffave Safe and-ifappy ifohdays <br /> Denis L.Brown <br /> Project Manager <br /> Shell Oil Products US <br /> 20945 S. Wilmington Ave. <br /> Carson, CA 90810-1039 <br /> 707-865-0251 <br /> 7o7-290-91o1 (cell) <br /> 707-865-2542(fax) <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Kasey Foley [EH] [mailto:KFoley@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 10:16 AM <br /> To: Brown, Denis L SOPUS-OP-COR-H <br /> Cc: Margaret Lagorio [EH]; Raymond von Flue [EH]; kahemmen@sbcglobal.net; dlescure@cambria- <br /> env.com <br /> Subject: RE: 6131 Pacific, Stockton <br /> I can only tell you that our criteria regarding UST systems being compromised changes depending upon <br /> what actually happens at the site. You outlined Shell's policy for contractors to follow but if this policy was <br /> followed at 6131 Pacific Avenue no vent lines would have been exposed or crossed over and it appears <br /> they have been. <br /> So, again I am saying if any part of the UST system is exposed (meaning asphalt over it was removed) our <br /> Unit will require some type of follow up testing, be it pressure testing of the vent/vapor lines or secondary <br /> containment testing on the product lines/UST's. <br /> Another possible scenario is if any of portion of a slab was broken or removed over the UST system we <br /> would require testing. I hesitate using that specific example because in the past contractors have not <br /> obtained a permit (in circumstances unrelated to installing remediation systems), when a permit was clearly <br /> required, because they"did not break concrete". <br /> 7/11/2007 <br />