My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2002 - 2010
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
6131
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231223
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2002 - 2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2019 3:26:44 PM
Creation date
12/16/2019 1:48:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2002 - 2010
RECORD_ID
PR0231223
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0002324
FACILITY_NAME
Pacific Service Station
STREET_NUMBER
6131
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
09746418
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6131 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
473
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6131 Pacific, Stockton Page 3 of 7 <br /> 3. All contractors stay away from any UST system lines, we do not cross them and <br /> "usually" run most remediation lines from the wells to the parameters of the station <br /> lot where this is practical. <br /> I do not know all of the conditions for this site, or how far the work completed <br /> was from lines and tanks, however the above is our policy, and it is very unlikely <br /> the work completed compromised or impacted the UST system integrity. Nor, with <br /> work performed according to our site safety procedures and guidelines, we would <br /> ever impact our own UST systems or anyone else's. <br /> Again, the owner of this station is a hard working, honest party, who does not have <br /> a lot of extra money. This testing requirement was unanticipated by their family <br /> or us and impacts them greatly should they have to pay for it. <br /> I appreciate your responses, and we would still like to understand what type of <br /> criteria your agency would view as compromising UST systems, or where work <br /> performed near these systems would, in your agencies view, require a pressure <br /> test by owner or operator subsequent to the work completed. <br /> Yfave Safe and.7fappy Yfol days <br /> Denis L.Brown <br /> Project Manager <br /> Shell Oil Products US <br /> 20945S. Wilmington Ave. <br /> Carson, CA 9o810-1o39 <br /> 7o7-865-0251 <br /> 707-290-9101 (cell) <br /> 7o7-865-2542(&X) <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Kasey Foley [EH] [ma i Ito:KFoley@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 3:01 PM <br /> To: Brown, Denis L SOPUS-OP-COR-H <br /> Cc: Margaret Lagorio [EH]; Raymond von Flue [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 6131 Pacific, Stockton <br /> Let me clarify your last statement first. <br /> When the LOP staff review a remediation plan and the map shows placement of remediation <br /> piping etc.being installed over or near the UST system LOP staff will require the responsible <br /> party to contact the UST Compliance staff(Environmental Health Unit III)and comply with <br /> all Unit III's testing requirements after the remediation system components have been <br /> installed. Unit III will inquire as to the specific work that occurred onsite and will make a <br /> decision at that time. <br /> My concern with this approach is if the actual work performed is different than what was <br /> submitted for review there is a possibility that some sites may be missed. Other than that, <br /> this approach should work. <br /> 7/11/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.