Laserfiche WebLink
6131 Pacific, Stockton Page 5 of 7 <br /> be very helpful, as already indicated previously, we were not aware of <br /> the need of a permit though your agency. <br /> Again, thanks for your response. <br /> gianks <br /> Denis L.Brown <br /> Project Manager <br /> Shell Oil Products US <br /> 20945S. Wilmington Ave. <br /> Carson, CA 90810-1039 <br /> 707-865-0251 <br /> 707-290-9101 (cell) <br /> 7o7-865-2542(Fax) <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Kasey Foley [EH] [mailto:KFoley@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 8:45 AM <br /> To: Brown, Denis L SOPUS-OP-COR-H <br /> Cc: Margaret Lagorio [EH]; Raymond von Flue [EH] <br /> Subject: FW: 6131 Pacific, Stockton <br /> Dear Mr. Brown, <br /> I will attempt to provide answers to the questions you presented to Mr. von <br /> Flue. <br /> First, let me say that our agency is charged with enforcing Title 23 of the <br /> California Code of Regulations and the California Health and Safety Code <br /> (HSC) as it relates to compliance with the the underground storage tank (UST) <br /> law. As the enforcement agency, we are allowed by law(HSC 25289) to <br /> request any monitoring or testing of UST's if we believe it is necessary. <br /> According to law, we only have jurisdiction over UST owners which is why we <br /> wrote the Notice to Abate to the owner. Our concern does apply to every UST <br /> within San Joaquin County and I can assure you this is not the first time we <br /> have required someone working over a UST system to obtain a permit from our <br /> department. <br /> Although, we may have a concern about working near a UST system, we would <br /> not ordinarily require a permit be obtained for that unless we have reason to <br /> believe a portion of the UST system was at risk. In this specific instance, work <br /> was being performed over part of the UST system (vent or vapor lines were <br /> exposed)and it is our belief those line could have been compromised. We are <br /> asking the UST owner to test the secondary containment over the section of <br /> lines that were exposed. <br /> In order for us to witness the testing and review the results we must charge a <br /> fee to cover our time and that is the reason a permit is required from our office. <br /> I have spoken with Margaret Lagorio, the Program Coordinator of the UST <br /> Cleanup Unit(known as Unit IV), who has agreed to add language to her <br /> Unit's approval conditions requiring a permit be obtained from our Unit(known <br /> 7/11/2007 <br />