My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2002 - 2010
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
6131
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231223
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2002 - 2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2019 3:26:44 PM
Creation date
12/16/2019 1:48:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2002 - 2010
RECORD_ID
PR0231223
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0002324
FACILITY_NAME
Pacific Service Station
STREET_NUMBER
6131
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
09746418
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6131 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
473
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6131 Pacific, Stockton Pagel of 3 <br /> Raymond von Flue [EH] <br /> From: Margaret Lagorio [EH] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 12:30 PM <br /> To: Kasey Foley [EH] <br /> Cc: Raymond von Flue [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 6131 Pacific, Stockton <br /> Kasey, <br /> My thought is that when the LOP staff review a remediation plan and the map shows placement of remediation <br /> piping etc.being installed over or near the UST system we will require the responsible party to contact the UST <br /> Compliance staff(Environmental Health Unit III) and comply with all their testing requirements after the <br /> remediation system components have been installed. Is this what you thought? <br /> Margaret <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: denis.l.brown@shell.com [mailto:denis.l.brown@shell.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 9:07 AM <br /> To: Kasey Foley [EH] <br /> Cc: Margaret Lagorio [EH]; Raymond von Flue [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: 6131 Pacific, Stockton <br /> I appreciate your detailed response here and clarification as to why you are requesting <br /> this test. I was not aware the vent lines were exposed, and my understanding from our <br /> consultant was that no UST lines were exposed during our work. <br /> It appears there was some misunderstanding/interpretation of why you were requesting <br /> this test, and as it was relayed to me, this test would be a requirement for all work <br /> "performed near a UST system" to check to see if any compromise occurred to the <br /> system. Thus, my questions concerning drilling or other activities near or around UST <br /> systems which we perform on a somewhat regular basis. <br /> So, to clarify, the owner will have to perform a pressure test for secondary containment <br /> for all of the UST system, or only a portion of the system? <br /> Also, if this test is performed and witnessed, would this test meet his annual testing such <br /> that he would not have to retest again until the following year? This is an expensive test, <br /> the owner claims this will hurt him financially, particularly if he needs to complete it twice <br /> for this year. <br /> Finally, if my understanding is correct, your permit system will be changed somewhat in <br /> that where ever any work exposes the UST system, your agency will be notified through <br /> Margaret's group. This will be very helpful, as already indicated previously, we were not <br /> aware of the need of a permit though your agency. <br /> Again, thanks for your response. <br /> gianks <br /> Denis L.Brown <br /> 7/11/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.