My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2002 - 2010
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
6131
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231223
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2002 - 2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2019 3:26:44 PM
Creation date
12/16/2019 1:48:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2002 - 2010
RECORD_ID
PR0231223
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0002324
FACILITY_NAME
Pacific Service Station
STREET_NUMBER
6131
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
09746418
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6131 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
473
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6131 Pacific, Stockton Page 3 of 3 <br /> (209)468-3451 <br /> (209) 468-3433 Fax <br /> kfoley@sjcehd.com <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: denis.1.brown@shell.com [mailto:den is.1.brown @shell.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 5:16 PM <br /> To: Raymond von Flue [EH] <br /> Cc: dlescure@cambria-env.com <br /> Subject: 6131 Pacific, Stockton <br /> Dear Mr. Von Flue, <br /> It is my understanding that because of some work unrelated to the UST system <br /> performed at the above address by Shell, will now require the owner to perform a <br /> UST and Line leak test after our work is completed? My understanding that the <br /> premise for this is because we were saw cutting or trenching near the lines and/or <br /> USTs, and because this may potentially cause disturbance to the system, a UST <br /> pressure test would now be required for the owner? Please correct me if this is <br /> inaccurate or I am misunderstanding. <br /> My question is, has San Joaquin County adopted regulations requiring a UST leak <br /> detection test because of any work, such as the one outlined above, is required for <br /> all gas stations in SJ County? As a secondary note, would this also mean that for <br /> any drilling to install monitoring wells at gas stations that may be near any UST <br /> system SJ County would also now require a UST pressure test to the UST after <br /> completing the drilling? I am trying to get my arms about understanding this issue. <br /> Finally, I understand that you requested that a permit was needed from your Dept. <br /> to be complete the installation We apologize if this was required as we have been <br /> completing this type of work or a number of years and no other permitting agency in <br /> SJ County ever indicated this was necessary for installation of a remediation <br /> system, or other work unrelated to a UST system. Again, correct me if my facts are <br /> wrong. <br /> Please reach me at the enclosed. <br /> Tianks <br /> Denis L.Brown <br /> Project Manager <br /> Shell Oil Products US <br /> 20945S. Wilmington Ave. <br /> Carson, CA 90810-1039 <br /> 707-865-0251 <br /> 707-290-9101 (cell) <br /> 7o7-865-2542(fax) <br /> 7/11/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.