My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2002 - 2010
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
6131
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231223
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2002 - 2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2019 3:26:44 PM
Creation date
12/16/2019 1:48:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2002 - 2010
RECORD_ID
PR0231223
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0002324
FACILITY_NAME
Pacific Service Station
STREET_NUMBER
6131
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
09746418
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
6131 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
473
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10/10/2002 15:30 4089710135 SSS INC PAGE 03 <br /> Monitoring System Certification-Page 2 of 3 <br /> Site Address: 6131 Pacific Ave.@ Porter Date of Testing/Servicing: 9124102 <br /> A Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version installed: 119.02 <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> Eyes © No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Is the visual alarm oper-_clonal? <br /> •Yes ❑No* Were all sensors visually ins eetcd,functionally tested,and confirmed op-rational? <br /> 99 Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary eontaitunent and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> ®Yes 4 No* If alarms are rclaycd to a remote monitoring station,is all communications equipment(e-g,modem) <br /> n 'N/A operational? <br /> 0 Yes ❑No* For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate,or is electrically disconnected? If ycs:which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down! (C'heck all that apply) 0 Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confima.positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ❑Yes ❑No <br /> 11 Yes 0 No* For tanks systems that utilize the monitoring system as the rrimary tank overfill warning device(i-e-rao <br /> X N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fillpoint(s)and opera Ling roperly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarn-:.trigger? 0 % <br /> ❑Ycs* ®No Was auy rruwnitoring equipment replaced?If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> 0 Yes* x No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry system-? (f'herk all that apply) <br /> ❑Product; ❑ Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> N Yes ❑No* Was monitori system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach sel-up re arts i a linable. <br /> ®Yes El No* Is all monitoring cquipmcnt operational per meawfactwcis specifications? <br /> In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.