My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
F
>
FREMONT
>
848
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545098
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/17/2019 3:23:59 PM
Creation date
12/17/2019 3:08:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0545098
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0015639
FACILITY_NAME
COLBERG INC
STREET_NUMBER
848
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
FREMONT
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13546010
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
848 W FREMONT ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
127
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENT WORKPLAN <br /> COLBERG BOAT WORKS <br /> APRIL 2001 <br /> The results of the investigation were documented in Apex's report titled Results of Subsurface <br /> Investigation dated August 21, 1997. Colberg has been monitored quarterly for petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon constituents in the groundwater since July 1997. In September 1998, Apex <br /> submitted aremediation plan entitled Workplan for.Pilot Test and Feasibility Analysis for <br /> removal of hydrocarbons from groundwater. An Addendum to Workplan for Pilot Testing and <br /> Feasibility Analysis was resubmitted in January 1999. Prior to acceptance of the remediation <br /> plan, the County requested a mass balance calculation to determine whether remediation was <br /> necessary. In April 1999, Apex submitted a report entitled Mass Balance for Remaining TPH.G. <br /> Upon review of the report, the County determined that the extent of contamination had not been <br /> tdelineated east of MW-3. <br /> Based on the response of the County,Apex submitted a Workplan for Additional Subsurface <br /> d Site Characterization dated June 9 1999. On <br /> r <br /> Investigation an � September 29, 1999, Apex <br /> I. 6� g <br /> personnel implemented the Workplan and installed five geoprobes at the site to establish the <br /> extent of petroleum impacted groundwater east of monitoring well MW-3. The data obtained <br /> from the investigation was incorporated into a report entitled Estimated Mass of Petroleum <br /> Hydrocarbon Constituents Remaining in Groundwater, and submitted to the County on February <br /> 8, 2000. <br /> GHH assumed consulting responsibility for the site in May 2000. The County responded to the <br /> February 2000 Apex report in February 2001 by requesting additional soil and groundwater <br /> investigation east of MW-3 and soil boring SB-21 as shown on Figure 2. The County letter is <br /> included in Appendix A. <br /> Objective <br /> L. The objective of this Workplan is to present a scope of work which will evaluate the extent of <br /> impacted groundwater where it is currently undefined on the eastern portion of the site. This <br /> Workplan addresses the areas of concern with a screening investigation consisting of six geoprobes to approximately 15-feet below ground:surface (bgs). <br /> Soil and groundwater samples collected during the geoprobe investigation will be analyzed to <br /> determine the amount of hydrocarbons and oxygenates present at the site. Samples will be <br /> analyzed for the presence of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH G); benzene,toluene <br /> ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX); 1;2-dichloroethane 1,2 (DCA); ethyl dibromide (EDB); and <br /> oxygenated fuel additives including methyl-tertiary-butyl-ether(MTBE), DIPE, ETBE, TAME <br /> and TBA using EPA Methods 8015 Modified, 8020, and.8260B, respectively. <br /> Upon review and analyses of the screening investigation results, one to two additional <br /> groundwater monitoring wells may be installed to define the extent of impacted groundwater to <br /> the east of MW-3 and provide repeatable sampling data points. <br /> 2 <br /> I'� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.