Laserfiche WebLink
Soil Suitability I Nitrate Loading Study Irerracon <br /> Buddhist Temple Proposed Dormitory ■ Stockton, California <br /> July 11, 2019 ■ Terracon Project No. NA177056 <br /> convenient and simplified method to estimate long-term groundwater nitrate impacts on an area- <br /> wide basis. <br /> Hantzsche and Finnemore found that over a long period of time, water quality in the upper <br /> saturated groundwater zone closely approximates the quality of percolating recharge waters. <br /> They believe that their method is a good planning tool and provides useful information to planners <br /> and local officials but with some real limitations. In their article published in Ground Water, <br /> Hantzsche and Finnemore mention that "...the equation ignores dispersion, lateral flow, and <br /> mixing with groundwater flow from up-gradient areas. These processes would generally <br /> contribute to additional reduction of nitrate-nitrogen concentrations in groundwater to the extent <br /> that the nitrate-nitrogen concentration of groundwater flow from up-gradient areas is lower." <br /> The Hantzsche and Finnemore approach is "...a conservative (worst case)first approximation of <br /> groundwater nitrate-nitrogen concentration resulting from the combined effect of on-site sewage <br /> disposal systems and precipitation. This (the equation and approach) is for estimation of long- <br /> term effect(i.e., over years)on groundwater quality, and is not intended for prediction of seasonal <br /> changes" (Hantzsche and Finnemore, 1992). <br /> The method takes into account the development area, soil denitrification factor, rainfall volume, <br /> rainfall nitrate concentration, waste effluent quantity, and waste effluent nitrate concentration. The <br /> formula, assumptions and calculations used for the analysis are shown in Appendix F. The units <br /> of nitrate used in the mass balance equation are nitrate-N, of which the maximum drinking water <br /> contaminant level (MCL) is 10 mg/L. <br /> 2.1 Chemical and Physical Properties of Soil <br /> 2.1.1 Chemical and Physical Soil Properties <br /> Terracon reviewed the USDA Soil Survey of San Joaquin County (1992)for information regarding <br /> soil properties. Based on information obtained from the USDA sources, site soils consist of <br /> Devries sandy loam. Refer to Sections 1.1 and 2.12 for further discussion of the soils. Selected <br /> physical and chemical properties are listed in the following table. <br /> Table 7. <br /> Physical and Chemical Properties* <br /> Soil <br /> Soil Salinity Septic tank <br /> Name/ Depth USDA Unified Soil Clay Permeability reaction (mmhos/ absorption <br /> Map (in) Texture Classification (%) (in/hour) <br /> (pH) cm) fields <br /> Symbol <br /> 0-1.3Sandy loam SM 7-18 2.0-6.0 6.6-8.4 <2 <br /> Devries .._. - .._ - <br /> sandy Sandy 2.0-6.0 Severe; <br /> loam/ 13-28 loam, fine SM 7-18 6.6-8.4 <2 cemented <br /> 149 sandyloam pan <br /> 28-80 indurated --- -- -- --- --- <br /> *Selected USDA physical and chemical properties <br /> Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 14 <br />