SU0009994 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD CENTRAL VALLEY REGION ORDER NO• 80-055 NPDES NO. CA0078069 WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS FOR TURNER WINERY SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, (here- after Board) finds that: 1. Turner Winery, formerly known as Lodi Vintners, LTD. , submitted a Report of Waste Discharge to renew NPDES No. CA007809, dated 25 February 1980. 2. Turner Winery discharges an average of 0.30 MGD (13.1 1/sec) of waste cooling water into the Mokelumne River, a water of the United States, at a point in the N-1/2 of Section 36, T4N, R6E, MDBUM, in the town of Acampo during the months of August, September, October, and November. 3. Turner Winery discharges a maximum of 50,000 (2.2 i/sec) gallons per day of stillage wastes, floor wastewater, and fermentation tank washwater into evapora- tion/percolation ponds during the same period. 4. The discharge of Turner Winery is presently governed by Waste Discharge Require- ments Order No. 74-290 adopted by the Board on 24 May 1974 for Lodi Vintners. 5. The Board adopted a Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Basin on 25 July 1975. The Basin Plan contains water quality objectives for the Mokelumne River. 6. The beneficial uses of the Mokelumne River are agricultural supply; recreation; esthetic enjoyment; and preservation and enhancement of fish, wildlife, and other aquatic resources. The beneficial uses of local groundwater are domes- tic and agricultural supply. 7. Effluent limitations , and toxic and pretreatment standards established pursuant to Section 301 , 302, 304, and 307 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and amendments thereto are applicable to the discharge. 8. The action to adopt an NPDES permit is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 2.1000, et seq. ) in accordance with Section 13389 of the California Water Code. 9. The Board has notified the discharger and interested agencies and persons of its intent to prescribe revised waste discharge requirements for the discharge. and has provided them with an opportunity for a public hearing and an oppor- tunity to submit their written views and recommendations. 10. The Board in a public hearing heard and considered all comments pertaining to the discharge. Amended FOM/gs 5/30/80