Laserfiche WebLink
Upper Limits to Estimate Background Level Threshold Values (BTVs) or Not-to-Exceed Values <br /> ProUCL 4.0 can be used to compute several parametric and nonparametric upper limits that are <br /> used to estimate the BTVs or not-to-exceed values for data sets with NDs and without NDs. <br /> These upper limits include: upper prediction limits(UPLs),upper tolerance limits (UTLs), and <br /> upper percentiles. Some of the nonparametric methods such as the Kaplan-Meier(Meier, 1958) <br /> method and ROS methods are applicable on left-censored data sets having multiple detection <br /> limits. The background statistics as incorporated in ProUCL 4.0 are particularly useful when <br /> individual site observations from some impacted site areas(perhaps after some remediation <br /> activities) are to be compared with BTVs to determine if adequate amount of remediation and <br /> cleanup has been performed yielding remediated site concentrations comparable to background <br /> level concentrations; that is if the site concentrations can be considered as coming from(or <br /> approaching to)the population of background concentrations. <br /> The process of comparing individual site observations with BTVs or some other not-to-exceed <br /> values is also used for screening purposes (e.g.,before performing any cleanup and assessment) <br /> to identify the COPCs, and to determine if site areas under study need further sampling and <br /> remediation actions. Specifically,the process of comparing onsite data with the BTVs may help <br /> the working crew, project team, or the decision makers to take immediate decisions if more <br /> remediation and more onsite sample collection need to be performed at the site areas under <br /> investigation. <br /> The first step in establishing site specific background level contaminant concentrations for site <br /> related hazardous pollutants is to perform background sampling to collect appropriate number of <br /> samples from the designated site specific background areas or some agreed upon site reference <br /> areas. An appropriate DQO process(EPA, 2006) may be followed to collect an adequate number <br /> of background samples. It is desirable to collect at least 10-15 background samples to compute <br /> reliable estimates of BTVs. Furthermore, it is suggested not to use estimated BTVs and not-to- <br /> exceed values based upon background data sets of sizes smaller than 8-10. Once, an adequate <br /> amount of background data have been collected,the next step is to determine the data <br /> distribution. This can be achieved by using exploratory graphical tools (quantile-quantile (Q-Q) <br /> plots and histograms) as well as formal GOF tests as incorporated in ProUCL 4.0. <br /> Once the data distribution of a background data set has been determined, one can use parametric <br /> or nonparametric statistical methods to compute background statistics. A review of the <br /> environmental literature reveals that one or more of the following statistical limits are used to <br /> compute the background statistics; that is to determine and estimate background level <br /> contaminant concentrations. Collectively,these statistics represent estimates of the background <br /> threshold values (BTVs). The BTVs are estimated by statistics representing values in the upper <br /> tail(e.g., 95%upper percentile, 95%UPL) of the background data distribution. Typically, a site <br /> observation(preferably based upon a composite sample) in exceedance of a BTV (e.g.,UPL, <br /> upper percentile) can be considered as coming from a site area(location),which might have beeri <br /> impacted by the site-related activities. In other words, such a site observation may be considered <br /> as exhibiting some evidence of contamination at that site area(location) due to site related <br /> activities. For data sets with NDs,the BTVs can be estimated using upper limits based upon KM <br />