My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
3505
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009275
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2020 2:26:39 PM
Creation date
1/6/2020 1:37:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0009275
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004014
FACILITY_NAME
VALERO ENEREGY CORP/NUSTAR ENERGY
STREET_NUMBER
3505
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
16203003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3505 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Stantec <br /> Addendum Work Plan for Human Health Risk Assessment <br /> Former Tosco Bulk Terminal #10013 <br /> February 14,2011 <br /> COMMENT 1 "We concur with the proposed confidence limit and coverage of the statistical method. <br /> However, the UTL method is restricted to the analysis of normally distributed data. To prove that <br /> soil or groundwater data are normally distributed, ConocoPhillips may present the data as a semi- <br /> log probability plot. The soil and groundwater data may include a considerable amount of censored <br /> data. If soil or groundwater concentration data for any chemical being proposed for statistical <br /> analysis are not normally distributed and/or consist of a high percentage of non-detects, Central <br /> Valley Water Board staff will meet ConocoPhillips to formulate a non-parametric alternative for <br /> determining baseline and compliance concentrations for all applicable COCs." <br /> RESPONSE: Prior to application of the approved UTL statistical method, Stantec proposes to run <br /> the historical data through the USEPA developed ProUCL 4.0 software program. The ProUCL 4.0 <br /> software is a widely accepted tool used to address various statistical issues arising in risk <br /> assessment studies, in background evaluations, and in background versus site comparison <br /> applications. Most of the statistical methods described and recommended in USEPA guidance <br /> documents to compute 95% upper confidence limits have been incorporated in ProUCL 4.0. <br /> ProUCL 4.0 will help calculate the mean and standard deviation of the data and provide a <br /> determination of the normalcy of the data. Stantec proposes to use the outputs of the ProUCL 4.0 <br /> software usage to present to the RWQCB to evaluate whether the soil or groundwater data meets <br /> USEPA definitions of normally distributed. A USEPA fact sheet for the ProUCL 4.0 statistical <br /> software is included as Attachment 3. Additional details and functions of the program can also be <br /> reviewed on the USEPA website. <br /> Additionally, if through use of the software it is determined that the data are not normally distributed <br /> or are deemed censored, the ProUCL 4.0 software is able to recommend and apply several non- <br /> parametric testing approaches,which would be presented to the Central Valley Water Board staff for <br /> consideration. <br /> COMMENT 4: "Although Comment No. 5 in our 30 July letter specifically addressed TBA and <br /> methanol, the HHRH must address all applicable CDCs identified in investigation reports prepared <br /> for this Site. ConocoPhillips must provide the rationale for COCs deemed not applicable, and <br /> cancer risks and hazard quotients must be summed to assess the cumulative risk for exposure to <br /> multiple chemicals in the same exposure pathways. ..." <br /> RESPONSE:Stantec will consider all detected analytes as potential CDCs in the Tier 1 HHRA and <br /> compare them to applicable screening levels. <br /> COMMENT 5: "The HHRA Work Plan does not include a discussion about ecological risk <br /> assessment. If ConocoPhillips has determined that the remedial strategy will result in little or no <br /> effect on wildlife, a section must be included in the HHRA presenting this rationale." <br /> RESPONSE: Stantec will consider potential exposures to ecological receptors as part of the Tier 1 <br /> HHRH, taking into consideration the selected remedial strategy. The rationale for our conclusions <br /> regarding potential effects on wildlife will be presented as part of the HHRH. <br /> 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.