|
I o- .. TAB+ F 1 - CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED '�2A
<br /> FOR NO FURTHEFCTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGND TANK SITES
<br /> Site Name and location: _RAGU FooDS VA" DE-r., fSGIlC `IFFoons L)p-)o,,j Iyoy
<br /> ,.�_. ,., {..0 A?E r3Lc0 ROAD
<br /> 4pi" I'JI - ISO -aZ i; r Sl`ockTeNi SAN Jz1AQuj"
<br /> 1. )�C:s Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic, agriculture, industry and other uses within 2000
<br /> feet of the site; Ggt.AVEnas RluerL/D1 uenY,NG CA•�NL .'1, `�/ -Fr; 2 -SiTf Su PPkY t.j.`1.tS 2Sa'�
<br /> 2. YD'S Site maps, to scale, of area impacted showing locations of former;iand existing tank systems,
<br /> excavation contours and sample locations, boring and monitoring'well elevation contours rad'
<br /> .r 9 ._gradients,
<br /> and nearby surface waters, buildings, streets, and subsurface utilities; -t-A�; Rtk-4veo 19 8b
<br /> i 3. Ye-3 Figures depicting lithology (cross section), treatment system diagrams; F
<br /> 4. Yt5 Stockpiled soil remaining on-site or off-site disposal (quantity); S3oyd__,%t,,, FoRwAfLD LA^-Opt." MAY 9� I
<br /> 5, YE-5 Monitoring wells remaining on-site, fate; &mwq g 6 -a p;''3 r s Nlr� Q►nc 7V-11 600'o s /fir
<br /> 6. p Tabulated results of all groundwater elevations and depths to water,
<br /> t; 7. Y6 :Tabulated-results of all sampling and.analyses:
<br /> Yts Detection limits for confirmation sampling
<br />€ N Lead analyses
<br /> tl
<br /> 8. Y� Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in soil and groundwater, both on-
<br /> site and off-site:
<br /> Lateral extent of soil contamination r ga��A?En^�
<br /> `/ Vertical extent of soil contamination t 3"^fid 19 �'��� ® 7oi 6s toc�"g�ki y-171ct+cor:o nE�: .
<br /> TAuic pr Bn rra�
<br /> y Lateral extent of groundwater contamination 'g
<br /> Vertical extent of groundwater contamination
<br /> F
<br /> 9. y Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface remediation system and the zone
<br /> of capture attained for the soil and groundwater remediation`system;
<br /> 10. .,Yeg Reports 1 information
<br /> _ s Unauthorized Release Fo (URF)Nad/ga
<br /> QMRs (Dates) y 9 _S/F_2 9 9s 5/76 7 9l0 9/9& 0'J9�
<br /> YE75 PAR It,/8,K fIER r►/gz rf5y
<br /> _ FRP
<br /> \_O Other(report name) S,-TE CLd,,,R f j2tPans
<br /> -�,fv Well and boring logs astir
<br /> 11. Y"S Best Available Technology (BAT) used or an explanation for not using BAT; ���-�
<br /> 12. %3 Reasons why"background"was/is unattainable using BAT;',y67�o;tteo4ctrt.— VEA JNIAJwIK Bra g8 j9`i
<br /> 13. Mass balance calculation of substance treated versus that remaining; �3c 'rv/ I?o3 Ids SNA ne*,,404
<br /> 14. )cp Assumptions, parameters, calculations and model used in risk assessments, and fate and transport
<br /> modeling; Vit-FAcr1 MoUtl $ (�j �rwi:�txt�nti. mT+c.�r•bwA�t
<br /> 15. YW Rationale why conditions remaining at site will not adversely impact water quality, health, or other
<br /> beneficial uses; and 4S5tiM►+�� 1^' ?n�*ur� Fyiont�,�ror .
<br /> 16. ►`� WET or TCLP results
<br /> Comments: Lo" R►s To Qte—o-A-rek Seuaci RtM&.Bo ,a JZeft*).,r-` lobo 6k%.%ro pjj�
<br /> MOM- uSv L)2tJ ILPH4 AkpeA cc P resew es erw�riar+�
<br /> �ONCur�'ttc,r
<br /> By: )C tfm Ho-vc
<br /> Date: ,r
<br /> 8
<br /> -Z6-q
<br /> �P
<br />
|