My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012651
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WATERLOO
>
1400
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545129
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012651
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/12/2020 10:34:06 PM
Creation date
1/7/2020 8:42:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012651
RECORD_ID
PR0545129
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006171
FACILITY_NAME
Mizkan America, Inc.
STREET_NUMBER
1400
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
WATERLOO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205-3743
APN
14115002
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1400 E WATERLOO RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
150
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> GEOLOGY .illi Stauffer Chemical Company <br /> DEPARTMENT 1:i91 South 491h SlrC011 1 Hichmond,Cahfolnia 94804 I Tei.(415)231-1244 <br /> April 2B. 1987 <br /> Ms. Laurie Gotulla, R.5. i, } <br /> San Joaquin Local Health District J <br /> p. 0. Box 2009 <br /> Stockton, California <br /> rir'1+iEtG'•'t-�TAt klEIil..Tk't <br /> Dear Ms. Cotulla: 9:FrjPdi7/,5ER`lICES <br /> Attached is a copy of the laboratory report "Analys':s Of 50il Samples Collected <br /> FM 3/30/B7 at Stockton Ragu Plant". The report presents the data from the chemical <br /> analysis of soil samples collected from 3 soil borings taken at Ragu Foods' <br /> Stockton, California facility. <br /> The soil borings were made as aepart f aTsubsurface tanks investire gatied on Of potential e6 <br /> leakage from underground storage tank removal lin Mated the <br /> Analysis of soil samples collected at. the tine of <br /> presence of diesel , chlorinated benzenes,3/30/87and other b ezthat ene rhigh edievem of <br /> dy <br /> The results of the <br /> sampling Program <br /> diesel and low levels of benzene, toluene, xylene,soitlseadjabcenteto theasiterder <br /> the tank site. With the exception of one sample, <br /> were found to be free of hydrocarbon residue. No chlorinated benezenes were <br /> detected in any of the soil samples. <br /> The sampling program performed on 3/30/87 consisted of the collection of soil <br /> samples from 3 borings penetrating to a depth of 30 feet. One boring was made <br /> directly under the tank site and 2 borings were made l0 feet distant. The <br /> locations of the borings and the tank site is shown in Figure 1 of the attached <br /> report. <br /> In the boring made directly under the tank site, samPles were collected every <br /> 2.5 Ft. starting at a depth of 35 feet. The area had been excavated to a depth <br /> ous work. Diesel was found in the soil at <br /> of 14 feet during the previOf <br /> concentrations of 140000 to hle0epc�� go�m'ofconeasample,ms per gram). <br /> me <br /> nodieselresiidueablelwas <br /> the attached report. With t <br /> found in the other 2 borings. The one exception was the detection of 20-30 ug/B <br /> diesel at the l0-foot level in boring R-3. <br /> ank <br /> Minor amounts of aromatic volatile organics were foundounderluene heSfto�3i.7tug/g)+ <br /> site. Compounds detected included benzene (1 to 4.4 ug/g). None of these <br /> xylene (0.4 to 22 ug/g) and ethylbenzene (0.7 to 4. <br /> aromatic compounds were detected in the 2 soil borings adjacent to the site. <br /> re in soil <br /> t a <br /> No chlorobenzene or dichlorobenhenqualees ty assurancisamples a <br /> epro eduresthatwere <br /> -- — ----.. - ---------detection im_it Of 0-1 ug/9• <br /> --- - <br /> incorporated into the current analytical--program-show-that--had.-ch.lorinate_._.______ <br /> benzenes been Present. they would have been detected. It is felt that the <br /> reported detection of chlorinated benzene In the previous work was the result of <br /> the miss-identification of analytes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.