Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Joe Aldridge -2 - 12 June 2008 , <br /> ST Services Stockton Terminal <br /> • submit a second work plan addendum, if warranted based on the C-zone results, <br /> proposing deeper borings. <br /> NuStar has conducted monitoring at the Site since 1992. In 2002, gasoline releases occurred <br /> from aboveground storage tanks (AGTs) G 3301, G 3302, and D 1503. Groundwater <br /> monitoring at the Site is conducted pursuant to Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP) No. <br /> R5-2007-0818. Regional Water Board staff reviewed the 29 April 2008 Groundwater <br /> Monitoring Report, First Quarter 2008 (First QMR). <br /> The source area monitoring well, PS/MW-14, has historically contained SPH and therefore <br /> was not usually sampled until August 2005, when no SPH was observed. During the first <br /> quarter of 2008, the maximum concentrations of TPHd and BTEX in this well were <br /> 8,000 micrograms per liter (pg/L), 10,000 pg/L, 390 pg/L, 1,200 lag/L, and 950 pg/L, <br /> respectively. The highest concentration of TPI-Ig was detected in PS/P-12 at 67,000 pg/L. <br /> Maximum MTBE and TBA concentrations were 3,000 pg/L and 3,100 pg/L, respectively. <br /> NuStar did not sample monitoring well UP/MW-1 during the first quarter because it is <br /> reportedly buried by gravel and could not be located using a metal detector. NuStar proposes <br /> using an excavator to locate the well and will sample PS/WC-4S in the meantime to allow <br /> collection of data in this area. <br /> Our comments are presented below. <br /> 1 . Based on data from nearby sites, Regional Water Board staff believe that investigation of <br /> the C and D zones likely will be necessary to accomplish vertical delineation. We are <br /> concerned that the phased approach proposed by NuStar, which will involve the <br /> preparation of multiple work plans and equipment mobilizations, will unnecessarily prolong <br /> the investigation. Site characterization must be completed more quickly so that cleanup <br /> methods may be initiated. Thus, we request that NuStar consider applying the Triad <br /> Approach to performing this investigation instead of phased approach proposed in the <br /> Work Plan. The Triad Approach is a field investigation and cleanup strategy developed <br /> under the leadership of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that utilizes <br /> modern subsurface investigation techniques and a mobile analytical laboratory to cost- <br /> effectively achieve rapid site characterization. Guidelines for implementing Triad are <br /> available on the internet at www.triadcentral.org. By 25 July 2008, NuStar needs to submit <br /> a revised Work Plan to implement a more rapid investigation method, preferably in <br /> accordance with the Triad Approach. <br /> 2, The Work Plan states that an objective of the vertical delineation is to determine whether <br /> groundwater underlying and downgradient of the facility has been degraded by releases <br /> from the facility. NuStar has stated several times in the past year that it believes the <br /> pollution offsite downgradient of the NuStar facility originates from other facilities. <br /> Therefore, it appears that NuStar may intend to use the data obtained during this <br /> investigation to prove that the plume underlying and downgradient of NuStar originated <br /> from a different facility. However, the Work Plan contains no explanation of how this will be <br /> accomplished. Regional Water Board staff's goal for this investigation was to obtain data <br /> necessary to fully characterize the Site in preparation for cleanup. Given the high <br /> concentrations of pollution in the shallow zone on the NuStar site, it is likely that deeper <br /> zones also are polluted. Analysis of soil samples obtained during this investigation would <br />