Laserfiche WebLink
URS <br /> i, <br /> Ms. Victoria McCartney Page 4 <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> ARCO 5450 <br /> December 22,2005 <br /> i <br /> ' estimates, tabulated calculations, and a list of conditions and assumptions are presented in Attachment <br /> E. <br /> Historical soil data suggest initial soil masses of xylene and MtBE were approximately 0.01 pounds <br /> each. <br /> Historic groundwater data suggest initial groundwater masses of TPHg and benzene were 0.01 pounds <br /> and 0.32 pounds, respectively (Attachment E). Toluene, xylene, and tertiary butyl alcohol were also <br /> present in concentrations of less than one-one thousandth of a pound in groundwater. <br /> The mass estimate for the remaining MtBE is Iess than one-one thousandth of a pound in groundwater <br /> (Attachment E). <br /> FUTURE IMPACT ON GROUNDWATER AND MAXIMUM PLUME EXTENT <br /> Average annual MtBE concentrations in groundwater are shown on Figure 1 in Attachment F for a 99- <br /> g g g <br /> year prediction. The predicted maximum average concentration was 4.4E-7 mg/L(0.00044 gglL)MTBE <br /> in groundwater—essentially, zero predicted impact. <br /> SESOIL-$4 was used to predict leachate transport. Average monthly climate parameters were <br /> statistically generated using SESOIL-84 for each of the 99 years of the model runs. Mean monthly <br /> precipitation was reduced to 10 percent of the SESOIL-generated value to simulate concrete asphalt <br /> cover. The average annual groundwater concentrations were calculated using a modified Summers <br /> model in the software program UnSAT Suite Plus by Waterloo Hydrogeologic, Inc. <br /> SENSITIVE RECEPTORS <br /> During the fourth quarter of 2004, URS performed a sensitive receptor survey at the site to identify the <br /> locations of water wells (municipal, domestic, and agricultural) within 2,000 feet and surface water <br /> bodies, schools,and other receptors within 500 feet of the site. <br /> Based on a Department of Water Resources (DWR) well search, no water supply wells were identified <br /> within the 2,000-foot radius from the site. Two water supply wells were identified outside the 2,000-foot <br /> radius north-northwest and northwest from the site(Figure 1). <br /> The California Water Service Company supplies potable water to residents within 2,000 feet of the site. <br /> URS contacted Mr. Scott Bailey with the California Water Service Company to discuss water supply <br /> well locations within 2,000 feet of the site. URS confirmed that no active California Water Service <br /> Company supply wells exist within 2,000 feet of the site. <br /> KAWprocessU5 BP ARC01054501Soil Closure 05V7raft of 5450 Closure Report.doc <br />