Laserfiche WebLink
Ka. Beth Thayer <br /> Central Valley Regional ..Wat+er Quality -Control Board <br /> Page 2 <br /> Our .response to these issues raised by .sJEHU are as follows: <br /> 1. Best Available technology :for treating groundwater has <br /> typically not been successful at. reaching MCLS, much less ND,. for <br /> aromatic hydrocarbons in groundwater. . Many sites have been closed <br /> with levels higher than those recorded at Nor-Cal. Leaving these ; <br /> levels in place in not unprotective of public health or beneficial <br /> uses of groundwater in this area. It would appear that _SJEHd <br /> recognized these arguments previously since they requested your <br /> concurrence in closing the site, stating "all appropriate response <br /> actions have been completed, that all acceptable remedial practices <br /> were implemented, and that no further investigation, remedial <br /> action, or monitoring" was requ rred.: We note that on page. 10-11 of <br /> the State Board Resolution. 92-49 it states that the degree of <br /> threat to water quality and beneficial uses as well as the <br /> financial burden , whether 'to the discharger or the State, should <br /> be considered when prescribing investigative- and clean-up action <br /> levels. <br /> 2. We have reviewed the County file for the site referenced by � <br /> SJFJiD with respect to the divergent gradient. This site is -the <br /> Stockton Metropolitan Transit (SMART) property located <br /> approximately 1500 feet west of Nor-Cal. The' file does Indicate a <br /> SE-SW +gradientover approximately one year of monitoring, however, <br /> the gradient magnitude is consistently very low, around. .001. (5 <br /> feet per mile) , and the three wells'on which this is based are all <br /> within approximately 40. feet. of each other. This low gradient <br /> calculated from a tight Well cluster means that' small errors in i <br /> surveying or well elevation measurement will drastically affect <br /> gradient calculations. : More importantly, the quarterly reports <br /> ]repeatedly note that wellheads were submerged 'at the time' of <br /> monitoring and the reports show the- bus wash area and associated <br /> water sump is immediately (less ,than '15 feet) ,north--northwest .ot <br /> the monitoring wells, again suggesting site specific reasons for <br /> the calculated gradient. Although only mall amounts of dissolved <br /> contamination have been recorded at the SMART site, it rig important <br /> to note that well MW-3 (to the gest of the tank pit and ostensibly <br /> the upgradient well) had equivalent benzene concentrations and <br /> higher toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene concentrations than-did <br /> 'downgradient' well NW-2. This suggests that historically, at <br /> least on average, the gradient has a component to the west or <br /> northwest. <br /> As an additional check on our oariginal, work we obtained another <br /> nearby site file (Union Ice). located at the northwest corner of <br /> Lindsay and Union Streets (approximately 2500 feet due west of the <br /> Nor-Cal. site) . The gradient at Union Ice is .0025 to the <br /> northwest, also consistent with a convergence of the .local gradient <br /> in this part of Stockton toward Ragu, Foods located 3500 feet due I' <br /> north of the Nor-Cal site where large volumes of water are pumped <br /> Ci 'rG22--CsF ,(916) fJN031IW/GH1 IdWS36 Wcf60:E0 V6. EZ. 5na <br />